Akuma wrote:Just that you are feeling something doesnt mean its real. Theres people that are totally afraid of elevators or spiders, yet elevators and spiders pose no intrinsic danger. Just because you feel that someone likes you doesnt mean they like you, and especially it doesnt mean that you can feel something for them, since you are seperate people. So basically that girl never spoke to you, yet you are convinced she loved you and was heartbroken, and that friend of yours, too didnt say what you think he said, but you imagined this by the way he looked.
You are totally stupid about feelings and I would expect nothing less. Exactly what I would expect from someone who has NO genuine feelings of her own. The collection of defense mechanisms constituting what you have come to think is your personality and what I came to call "the false self" simulates the feeling and its afect, instead of feeling it. I dont blame you, its enormously decieving. But those are not the same feelings other people have, you can switch from one feelings to another in an instant and the positive ones come bundled with negative ones. Some people in fact do get panic attacks and feint in closed spaces and near spiders, you can say its not dangerous, or that definitions of what is real are extremely broad. Is the physical sensation of heartbreak not real? The brain registers it as physical pain google says. Wasnt realy that I was in agony, not being able to get out of bed from the remorse of how I treated her? That I had overwhelming urge to kill myself, to overdose. That I had no attention span, not being able to eat or do simple body maintenance. Was real enough for me. You said its impossible to feel for another (seperate) person. I have no doubt its impossible for YOU, as pwNPD. Its actualy emotional contagion, a constituent of emotional empathy:
"Emotional contagion is the phenomenon of having one person's emotions and related behaviors directly trigger similar emotions and behaviors in other people. One view developed by Elaine Hatfield, et al., is that this can be done through automatic mimicry and synchronization of one's expressions, vocalizations, postures and movements with those of another person.[1] When people unconsciously mirror their companions' expressions of emotion, they come to feel reflections of those companions' emotions.[1] Emotions can be shared across individuals in many different ways both implicitly or explicitly."
"Affective empathy, also called emotional empathy:[25] the capacity to respond with an appropriate emotion to another's mental states.[24] Our ability to empathize emotionally is based on emotional contagion:[25] being affected by another's emotional or arousal state.[26]"
The human capacity to recognize the bodily feelings of another is related to one's imitative capacities, and seems to be grounded in an innate capacity to associate the bodily movements and facial expressions one sees in another with the proprioceptive feelings of producing those corresponding movements or expressions oneself.[21] - this is how I knew what he was "saying". Becouse he was laughing at me. How stupid I am. There is many ways to express yourself. Not everything has to be done verbally.
So yes I knew EVERYTIME she was in love, becouse I had photographic memory of her mental state. I didnt need to ask. I just needed empathy. And I couldnt ask, becouse that way we might actualy be together. And with object constancy it was even more obvious - for example waiting for me in the same place she first confessed her love multiple times.
Akuma wrote:From my perspective your tight grip on all those psychological words to describe you and your experiences is not insight but an attempt to keep your self together
Unfortunately Akuma, You lack the genuine insight required to understand how much this applies to you. I removed the apostrophy on purpose, maybe you can at least tell me the reason why?
It would mean a lot. That you do understand something.
Now notice: I shared almost all my most intimate details and you know nothing about me still. Not understanding anything and even denying my experience is real. While you shared almost nothing except textbook knowledge and insults, and I understand EVERYTHING about you. Thats becouse you have no genuine insight. And Thats becouse I was the same way as you, and I developed genuine insight. And the reason for it is that everything you came to think about yourself Is a confabulation. An adaptive reaction to extract attention. And that there IS NOTHING to know about you more than that. No depth or personality, just what I have come to call the false self.
Now I know what you will say in response to that. That I am the problem and damaged. Always other people are the problem to the NPD. Never a problem with himself. Even though you are the one lashing out. Not being civil.