A member of my extended family is causing us some concern. She's got a four year old daughter who has mild learning difficulties, but it appears to everyone else in the family that she is trying to make the learning difficulties seem much greater than they are - she has a track record of exaggerating illnesses herself in order to garner sympathy (I've lost count of the terminal illnesses she has - unfortunately, stupidity doesn't count!), and a couple of year ago was stripped of all the disability allowances she was claiming when a doctor realised that her problems are a little more than bone idleness. She manipulates unwary people with the skill of a con-artist, winning them over with her sob stories and then fleecing them for money and favours (in one case, someone at her church agreed to rent her a new house, which she completely wrecked and never paid a penny in rent for).
It is by-the-by, but I am actually convinced that her daughter's learning difficulties are the result of shaken baby syndrome - at my insistence, social services investigated this three years ago and sadly couldn't find sufficient evidence. They did implement 24 hour surveillance for several weeks, but have been less directly involved in a supervisory capacity ever since.
I now think that she's trying to label the child as disabled to either garner more benefits from the government, or more sympathy from other people she can use. She puts the child in a wheelchair when she is perfectly capable of walking, fastens her nappies so tight that the child cannot pull them down to go to the toilet (so the child now doesn’t drink a lot so she doesn’t have to wee in her nappies), buys every tool possible that is intended to support children with special needs when she doesn’t actually need any of them, and generally goes out of her way to make sure that her child is labelled as ‘special’ so that she can be seen as the doting mother who has a hard life bringing up this ‘difficult child’.
She joins every society possible for concerned parents, and always writes posts in on-line fora in such a way that everyone will see her as a victim and reassure her that she is a wonderful parent. She isn't. She's just a very competent liar.
To my mind, this is just another form of child abuse – the child is starting to believe that she is disabled, even though when away from her mother, she can run, jump and play just like any other child. My wife (an early years teacher with a special needs background) believes that she is at the lower ability end for her age group, but certainly not to the point where she needs special equipment – she just needs time spending with her. She can’t use a knife and fork well, but that’s probably because she’s fed on a diet of McDonalds and KFC so has not had a lot of experience of cutlery! She can't hold a pen properly, but again, lots of kids start school without that ability - it doesn't mean they are disabled.
To give you another example, the reason we involved social services was because the child's behaviour and health changed abruptly - at a time when her mother was talking to my wife about how angry and frustrated she was with bringing up a baby (and she has a very firey, volatile temprament - her first marriage was very unhealthy, with both sides regularly beating the other up), overnight the child lost much of her vision and became very withdrawn and unresponsive - classic symptoms of shaken baby syndrome. This is what triggered an investigation, but there wasn't sufficient evidence to take it much further, just the circumstantial evidence of the child's condition.
However, the aftermath provided a real insight into her state of mind - she claimed her daughter was having lots of tests (which she wasn't - at least, not the ones she said her daughter was having) and that she was virtually blind (which she wasn't) and that it was an untreatable condition (which it isn't) - and insisted this was the case even after the child had had an operation to repair the damage. She spent months applying for grants and funding, and even secured a place in a school for blind children, until their assessment revealed that the child's eyesight could be largely corrected with spectacles. From an outside perspective, she was relishing the attention - she'd tell everyone she met about how hard it had been and how bleak the child's future was, but that they were willing to give up everything to give her the best possible start in life. And people believed her, as they always do, and she started to receive all kinds of stuff - clothes, money, accommodation - from people who were moved by her terrible plight.
It didn't wash with us, any more than the illness she had that would leave her in a wheelchair within 12 months did six years ago. Surprise, surprise - it didn't.
I don’t know what we can do to help the child out – social services are already involved, but the mother is expert at saying the right things, and making sure she’s surrounded by well-meaning (foolhardy) folk who sit with her in meetings telling the social workers just what a good mother she is being. And when people finally get the measure of her, they move somewhere else to start it all again.
I don’t know if there is an element of Munchausen’s syndrome here, or if is it pure manipulation, but the person who will lose the most is a child who is starting to accept the label her mother has created for her.
I can understand why social services are fooled by the mother – she’s not guilty (this time) of physically hurting the child, she’s just mentally damaging her and doing everything she can to make the child into a victim who needs help. Other kids laugh at the child for still wearing nappies – and the child sees this but can’t do anything other than stopping drinking – so she’s a victim. She puts her in a wheelchair as ‘she gets tired easily’ (but all kids claim they are tired on shopping trips – and just like other kids, she perks right up when she realises that she can play in the adventure play area at the end of the shopping trip!), and she insists on giving her a dinner plate that separates the different food items, as the mother’s convinced she’s autistic, but she doesn’t have a problem eating food when it is presented on a normal plate – in fact, it makes her feel grown up!
And yet, because she spends every waking hour looking for extra support (money) for her child, and using it to buy every implement necessary to make life easier for her child (most of which is completely unnecessary), she appears like a doting mother.
So the first question is, does this sound like MbP from this description, and the second question is how the heck can you help this child to be given a decent life, or is the writing on the wall, and she’ll be permanently damaged by the mother? I feel wicked saying it, but I couldn't give two hoots about how the mother reacts, it just riles me to the core that this child could be permanently damaged by this.
Sorry for such a long posting, especially as it is my first, but hopefully the detail will help.