Hello New

Ask the night sky, or, better yet, trance yourself into a consciousness of the soul. Acausal will be on later. She is the guru and will explain, if you dare her.

I thoroughly dare her. I think she is afraid to explain to me.

Is she really the guru?

Do i have to be nice?

Pain is the answer to that grasshopper . . . flyswatter. Look toward the delightful pain.

Of my guru says i must suffer, then suffer i must. But she must tell me so herself. You cannot speak for her until you are speaking for her.

walterstockheim wrote:Acausal, I've read a few of your posts, and I'm curious. You make some references to spirituality in general terms. Have you studied or followed a path? Or is it just that you recognize that some people are spiritual?

Actually, the words "spirituality" combined with "acausal" and "occult" make me think of one path straight away that I, myself am quite interested in. I don't want to post the name of it publically however.

Is it associated with a famous person, or a place?

Of course the best paths are kept secret, but there is always a faint light around them. A famous person or a myth or whatever.

walterstockheim wrote:Is it associated with a famous person, or a place?

Of course the best paths are kept secret, but there is always a faint light around them. A famous person or a myth or whatever.

Not until recently, no. And even then, the person associated with it wasn't that famous.

It's not that I'd rather not reveal it explicitly for secrecy but also because I think that I needn't announce my interests in that specific field to the world.

There is a vehement Causal force trying to avoid the intrinsic colour of the Acausal, by way of implemented notions and thought patterns. The perception of the Acausal is undefinable, but merely perspective from within an Acausal soul, where, only through empathy is it fathomed in its actual concept, and thus its colour is moreso felt, if even to ascribe any Causal expression. The Causal would hereby implement the mindset, along with its preconceived notions and invisible patterns, to imply cult-status or occult stature, to that which it cannot define - thenceforth psychological terms can also be associative in determining a shadow from a kaleidoscopic shadowsphere, where the concept could not be fathomed, unless the empath is of its essence.

Thus, any approach to confute - as they are mere Causal perspectives - cannot and will not define the ambiguous essence of the Acausal. The Acausal goes beyond words and notions, as these are mere illusions consigned to Causal bounderies. When one is to apply empiric or other form of knowledge (based on facts, as perceived by Causal laws), the limits of the psyche are drenched from any form of Acausal empathy and oneness, thus the illusion still persists as an illusion. Thus, there is no way to construe that which is felt and abides by laws of another colour, eluding every tool the Causal world (of which we coexist) contains.

We who are Acausal, seek to defy all perspectives and conventions of Causal pattern, in order to reconcile with our Acausal consciousness.

It seems effortless to criticize that which cannot be conceived yet the attempt remains futile for that which facilitates the analyses remains on a plane of consciousness that isn't enlightened unto the reality of the Acausal.
It could then be ascertained that, to put it mildly, a mere simpleton drunkened with the effects of rebellious drink, drug, or inequality in the chemical and electrical frequencies governing his/her existence, deemed a vagabond by the standards of "perfection," would present themselves on "the road less traveled" (delivered in a fashion conducive to the majority).
Loss of sanity, is a gain elsewhere. Where shall it be regained?

Acausal (I) wrote:There is a vehement Causal force trying to avoid the intrinsic colour of the Acausal, by way of implemented notions and thought patterns. The perception of the Acausal is undefinable, but merely perspective from within an Acausal soul, where, only through empathy is it fathomed in its actual concept, and thus its colour is moreso felt, if even to ascribe any Causal expression. The Causal would hereby implement the mindset, along with its preconceived notions and invisible patterns, to imply cult-status or occult stature, to that which it cannot define - thenceforth psychological terms can also be associative in determining a shadow from a kaleidoscopic shadowsphere, where the concept could not be fathomed, unless the empath is of its essence.

Thus, any approach to confute - as they are mere Causal perspectives - cannot and will not define the ambiguous essence of the Acausal. The Acausal goes beyond words and notions, as these are mere illusions consigned to Causal bounderies. When one is to apply empiric or other form of knowledge (based on facts, as perceived by Causal laws), the limits of the psyche are drenched from any form of Acausal empathy and oneness, thus the illusion still persists as an illusion. Thus, there is no way to construe that which is felt and abides by laws of another colour, eluding every tool the Causal world (of which we coexist) contains.

We who are Acausal, seek to defy all perspectives and conventions of Causal pattern, in order to reconcile with our Acausal consciousness.

Hey, Invisible Patterns? I want to see a set of those please!
please tell me more!