It was actually an innocuous suppliment to your notion heading towards option B and C. I am not pointlessly aggressive enough so as to intend option A (true as it may be). Given there was a combination that would also qualify E.Iron Angel wrote:digital.noface wrote: However it is easy to see which opinions are blatant and overt coping mechanisms and which are limited observations, unprovable as either may be.
This sentence intrigues and baffles me.
Are you trying to say that;
A: What I wrote is a blatant and overt coping mechanism (which it is; cynnical intellectualization based on personal observation)
B: The idea of an after life is a coping mechanism (also true)
C: just a statement saying what people say and beleive can be either a coping mechanism or just a passive "limited observation".
D: Both A & B
E: All of the above or some other combination
F: None of the above. You are trying to say something else that I failed to comprehend.
Careful. Your tearing the security blanket...Philo wrote:I realize this aspect might have been voiced already (I'm not gonna read ALL the posts), but if reincarnation was true wouldn't the number of people on earth be always the same? How come more and more people are being created? Obviously because birth is dependent upon fertilization and not on a previous life.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests