shanzeek wrote:Just bear in mind that all of this exists within a system of logical rules, it might be complicated but there is no magic going on here.
You mean to say hackers don't rely on their intuition and divergent thinking? Your habit of demystifying everything is threatening to colour-blind us all, Quoth.
Just kidding.
It’s curious that you guys always seem to perceive me as this hardline realist. Most of the RL descriptions of me, including my performance reviews, typically have a semi-religious quality. When i told my girlfriend that I was spending this time on a psychology site, she said ‘I can see how that’d appeal to your philosophical bent’. Yet here....anyway
What I’m saying is that when someone is trying to sell you magic beans, it pays to remember that jack and the beanstalk is just a fairy tale. This kind of manipulation relies on appealing to your idealised conception of something (often related to how it’s represented in the zeitgeist) over your own knowledge of that thing usually assisted by your own desire or anxiety that the idealised form is true.
As to whether ‘hackers’ make great use of intuition, I would not like to say. I certainly have in my time in both the physical and life sciences, however I always fall hard to the theoretical side of the theorist/experimentalist divide. I suspect that the pot boilers would have less use for intuitive leaps but in either case no amount of intuition is going to be worth a damn if it isn’t coupled to a deep and highly nuanced understanding of the system under investigation.
There is plenty of room for the profound in my world view. In fact I would probably argue that the profound cannot exist without realism, just as love without honesty is just infatuation based on idealisation.