HPD Latest Public Stunt-Slutwalks (Non Thread)

What works for me is to look at analogous situations.

So there is this show title "To Catch a Predator". The show catches at best a small fraction of potential online predators out there. Now I thought the show did a great public service catching the few hundred they caught, but again black and white thinking is easy to fall into. The black or white (or A or B) solution to the problem is to try and stop the problem by arresting the predators (choice A), or by trying to stop the minors (choice B), but ignores other choices like both. Since the predators are out there and clearly are not going to stop (many of those caught had seen the show and knew it might be a setup), as a parent I'm in favor of both. Do more to catch the predators while at the same time I took responsibility for my kids and made them aware of the dangers, and to avoid putting themselves in positions that could put them at risk.

In non black and white thinking multiple things that are in conflict can be true at the same time. So for example, you have a right to do X, but at the same time, doing so may be dangerous. For example, I have the legal right to buy a steak dinner and eat it in front of homeless people in a dark alley, and if they attacked me and took my food they'd be legally in the wrong, but still most people would have said to me, xdude, you're being incredibly naive about the real world and human nature.

So I think there is a blurry line between whether people react negatively to a march like that because they are denying rights, or because they are frustrated with naive/wishful thinking that thinks that the dark side of human nature will disappear over something as simple as marching. And for some people it's both. They both agree woman should be able to dress how they wish whevever while at the same time are frustrated by naive/wishful thinking that predators will stop being predators due to marching.

Alice wrote: The hatred of the HPD just flourishes through the title of this thread.

Title of thread: Re: HPD Latest Public Stunt-Slutwalks (Non Thread)

Alice the title on this thread said it was for "non's only" discussion.

I noticed you started a thread for HPD's only re: Fan Club. No non's posted to your thread, out of respect for the boundry you set. So please respect the boundries of others.

OK

okherewego212 wrote:

Alice wrote: The hatred of the HPD just flourishes through the title of this thread.

Title of thread: Re: HPD Latest Public Stunt-Slutwalks (Non Thread)

Alice the title on this thread said it was for "non's only" discussion.

I noticed you started a thread for HPD's only re: Fan Club. No non's posted to your thread, out of respect for the boundry you set. So please respect the boundries of others.

OK

Which is unfortunate that the forum came to a point of having the boundary, because Alice's explanation of the reason why someone with HPD needs a FAN club was so accurate, so correct, it really is exactly what I finally realized about the EX HPD GF in my life. I think many NONs would have liked to have participated, even thank her for explaining it so clearly.

But then maybe it just can't work well to intermix the feelings of those dealing with a psychological issue, with those who have been hurt by someone with a psychological issue, on the same forum. While we can learn something from each other, we're coming at this from very different perspectives, and hurts on both sides are bound to result in some anger.

OneLiner wrote:

CptSaveAho wrote:not sexy enough to be HPD, and no solo HPD would be in such a large group: that would distract from all the attention!

You mean they are not TRUE histrionics? So what are they? BPD? Secret schizoids?

Feminists :p

Xdude wrote: Which is unfortunate that the forum came to a point of having the boundary, because Alice's explanation of the reason why someone with HPD needs a FAN club was so accurate, so correct, it really is exactly what I finally realized about the EX HPD GF in my life. I think many NONs would have liked to have participated, even thank her for explaining it so clearly.

Part of the reason it has come to this, is because boundries weren't being respected in the first place. If they have no boundries in real, life, why would they respect them here. The boundry was set for this thread, as non's only, and it needs to respected.

I agree with her fan club post, as it is very obvious it all started from poor support from parenting issues. However it doesn't make the behavior right or excusable. Understandable YES.


OK

http://www.slutwalktoronto.com/
That's a site where women talk about why they joined SlutWalks.
http://www.theage.com.au/world/cops-com ... 1ediv.html
Here's an article about how the police officer telling students that they shouldn't dress like sluts if they don't want to be assaulted sparked the protests.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SlutWalk
There are more articles there too, at the bottom of the wikipedia page.

Now, since it's obvious that it's possible to google "SlutWalks" and see that it's mostly women who have been raped and choose to participate in those protests because they've had enough of people telling them it was their fault for how they dressed or behaved, I'm going to assume that those of you who posted here saying that it's about HPDs wanting attention don't exactly have the best of intentions.
One more stunt like this and you're going back on the mod preview for good this time.


EDIT: I will ask Alice not to post in threads created by nons anymore, or we'll all find some kind of system that works, just to keep things fair to all nons.