by wisdom » Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:48 pm
Dr Ok,
First off, thanks very much for posting here. Totally understand you are constraint bound from demonstrating your techniques here with live case studies. However totally appreciate you mingling in here with so many HPD sufferers to hear them first hand, and to offer HPDers and Non’s alike such great access to your thinking and writings.
I have to be honest; I’m not following what you posted clearly.
It strikes me a bit like some of Kernberg’s writings. He writes on many levels simultaneously, and worse yet his deep meaning sometimes requires that you hold in working memory several paragraphs (or even pages). What he talks about “prior” is often only understandable from what comes “later”. If your attention slips even for a second, you can’t process his meaning. Reading twice helps, but not completely.
Kernberg always seems to write assuming the audience has a full working background in classic psychoanalytic theory, and object relations theory as his starting points. Almost like he’s addressing third year psychiatry students. On top of that he then extends the classic psychoanalytic theory and object relations concepts well beyond the basics in ways that are uniquely his. At the end of the day you need to put in significant analytical effort to dissect his writings and spend plenty of time clarifying what you lacked as a foundation, by chasing down many of his references, reading relevant portions of them, then returning to his work prepared to tackle it. However, with effort it can be done, and its very rewarding when you finally “get it”. His references are invaluable!
When talking about theories of HPD I think you would be far out in front if you explain where you are starting at vs. Kerberg, Linehan, Bollas, Millon, Benjamin, DSM4/DSM5, or even the emerging neuropsych models at NIMH. That way you could connect people with what you agree with, regarding HPD, and the collective knowledge of it that so far has been built up. Then demark your unique departure with your specific theories of how it operates and build it up from there.
I note that most of the personality theory experts are now getting pretty old - ample room for some solid fresh thinking, and fresh approaches. I’d very much agree, not all experts converge. Yet they do seem to share some major foundation blocks.
With all the current emphasis on managed care, outcome analysis and a medical model (neuroimaging, genome mapping, neuron tracing) it seems like the profession really lacks bright, new, upcoming personality theorists. No one seems to have time for it. Yet it seems like an area that is far from finished. No matter how much they know or learn about the “computer” hardware, the software functions and understanding of the full software “programs” should still be critically important.
I hear all the new psych interns are overloaded being taught the cheapest way to treat each disorder. They come out having memorized a cookbook. Totally lacking in the underlying theory they can’t deal with anything “off the standard menu.” Meanwhile what individual walking into a therapist’s office wasn’t at least 50% totally unique and off the menu?
Your stuff on responsibility development obviously struck a cord here in the HPD forum. When you say “False Self” I think narcissism. When you say BPD beneath HPD I feel like I want to see the full model (like Kernberg’s chart, Millions Styles, Benjamin’s breakdowns.)
You seem to talk about when the infant experiences themselves as the center of the universe – I equate that with not yet differentiating themselves from their mother -- seeing the two as a single unit. Am I way off track? Were you talking about HPD/BPD developing at that 0-1 stage wouldn’t “everything after” like incest, physical and emotional abuse, or utter neglect at ages 2-8 not count at all in developing the disorder?
..so confusion abounds in my head.
If you are coming at this from a family therapy or dyad type analysis that might explain my ignorance. Read some cool stuff from Jurg Willi and David Schnarch, and certainly love a good genogram. But I lack any background in family therapy, social psychology, etc.
Perhaps some clinical examples (masked transcripts) from your practice would also be great?
I am not a professional therapist. My postings here are provided for general informational purposes only and are not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or psychological advice. See: site
Disclaimer and
Notes