AlwayGrowing wrote:I've never come across 'object constancy' before. Could you elaborate a bit?
I've heard about it mostly in relation to BPD, but I believe it may apply with HPD as well. More info:
http://www.outofthefogsite.com/CommonBehaviors/LackOfObjectConstancy.htmlHPD will normally have people (typically of the opposite sex) around saying how wonderful, attractive, intelligent, and importantly 'good person' he / she is. This is what is being observed in the moment. Recalling past events, if this poses problems, will then be done through the filter of what is currently being observed. So the twisting of facts and blameshifting might be very real in the mind of the HPD (as we know it sometimes is), and maybe this is one of the reasons why. ("There was a fight; I am a 'good person', so I would not have done what I'm being accused of, so what must have happened is ... (story that makes him / her the victim)).
Wow... I'd never connected their revisionism with lack of object constancy before, but you're right, it does make sense. Perhaps (and I'm totally speculating here), there's a difference in neurotransmitters or something that means that when a 'file' is accessed, the emotional memory begins at the same time as the data portion of the memory 'file'. Then, rather than recalling the data first and then the emotional impact afterwards, the details are filtered by the emotional recollection and get restructured to fit.
This could also in part explain the constant need for validation - the support you gave before 'doesn't count', as it's not being observed at this very moment?
That makes a lot of sense too. Nothing you did for them in the past feels like it's "still there" emotionally, it's only what you're doing for them *right now* that matters. Great points, you've given me something to think about over the weekend!