by mindful » Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:27 pm
Our experiences and paths may have been quite different, but I believe we're still saying quite the same thing, Jo..
I think the key is the distinction between the emotion and the reaction to it.
The insight meditation which I practice (yes, based on 2500-year old Buddhist teaching) teaches that the body is, more often than not, the origin of the emotions. Alexander Lowan (Narcissism..) bases his therapy on the same premise.
By the time our mind gets around it (the emotion), it's already weaving the habitual stories, justifications around it, feeding it with concepts and 'selfing'.
If we can let it develop as a sensation, in the body, heart, chest, without adding our conditioned thought processes to it, we let it evolve, without reacting to it, through our words or actions, sure, but even limiting our mental reactions to it!
I've experienced this recently through my on-going relationship with my N-friend-student. I can easily reason away why I don't need to let him condition me, the anger is useless, etc, and the whole thing subsides. But the 'anger' continues to well up, unexpectedly.
The other day I was making dinner. My mind went there, the feeling arose in my gut, and I experienced it as pain. Pain for myself, and sorrow for my own pain, and I let it arise, with a sense of compassion FOR THE ANGER and pain. It filled my body, I let the tears flow, and I felt a simultanous awareness of it, and release.
Believe me, the sense the peace and acceptance that followed was remarkable.