So you talked to a sociopath, one girl with BPD, and you read some stuff. And that is exactly how much information and experience you have, outside of some apparently bad relationships you don't mention. Okay.
"Anyway, this guy told me that people's only use for him is to provide a service and he will play a part for them in order to get it. Since he doesn't have a real personality underneath everything but is playing one to get their services what he is doing is in fact a lie as he is projecting forth something he is not."
Who is "he"? What makes the decision to project something? Why project one sort of personality, and not another? Why choose blue instead of red?
When we attempt to explain ourselves to people, we are forced to describe ourselves in ways that can be interpreted that we are intentionally presenting ourselves in a certain way for a certain effect. To an extent, we are. Rightly or wrongly, we are strongly driven to present ourselves in a way that will cause people to like us rather than dislike us. I believe normal people also to some degree maintain a degree of control over what they want people to know about them, but are less driven to do so for approval. Even so, I don't know anyone "normal" who intentionally pisses people off for no reason.
You cannnot have it both ways: If we have no personality, as you say, then of course we must construct something to interact with the world. If we do have a personality, and we construct a false one, then of course we are lying -- unless, as has been my experience, our "real" self does not always make itself available for interviews and public appearances (cue the interpretive dance segment of the program), which in my experience is weirdly like those dreams where you show up for school naked.
Lying is a choice to act or behave in a way opposite to the truth. This makes the assumption that the truth is known; however, in our case, the real self, the truth, is
not known. The constructed personality is not a lie, per se., so much as it is our
attempt to be ourselves when the Self has gone awol.
That we are uncertain of who we are does not mean that we have no personality; although that information appears all over the place, it's entirely untrue. First of all, personality is at least in part genetically encoded, so in the same way that I have red hair and green eyes, for example, I also have my father's ability to be very analytical about things, and my mother's light sarcasm. Other BPD's will not possess those traits. It is impossible not to have a personality, however submerged or damaged it becomes by the events of our lives. Let's face it: Although the disease filters our interactions with the world, we are not all identical. If we actually were blank slates, with no personality, we would be. If you are finding that we are, then my feeling is that you are interacting with the disease -- you are drawn to the symptoms, which, unfortunately, have a dark side.
If you still have no feelings for this man yet for some reason go on with the relationship regardless then yes you are playing a role. That of human with genuine emotions.
Ever heard that saying, if you love something set it free? Of course you have. I can construct a self to deal with what I have to -- but I will only go back to that which I love and trust. The men I go back to are very few and far between. If I keep turning up in your life, I may not know myself why I keep showing up to see you, but chances are very good I actually like you.
And there've you've done it again, by the way. Suggested that I am not human.
I buy into the idea at least half way as Cluster B's do know right from wrong and more often than not choose wrong over right. Why am I divided on this? Well because they don't have the same emotional range as a normal person obviously and don't have a genuine reference point and most importantly empathy to go by to feel how incredibly hurtful their actions are to people.
Interesting. So now we lack empathy, although, in fact, you are entirely alone in ascribing lack of empathy to all Cluster B disorders; only sociopaths are said to lack empathy. But you have elsewhere described us as if we are all sociopaths in essence.
I don't lack empathy. I have been hurt to prevent people I loved from being hurt, I have sat up all night with someone else's injured pet, I picked up the wounded bird from off the street and moved it to a safe place -- I have passed the "empathy test." So you're wrong.
This brings us into the realm of religion and philosophy: Does morality necessarily acrue to mental health? If one is normal, is one therefore incapable of or unlikely to choose to do selfish or evil acts? I don't believe you or anyone can answer that question yet.
His character was addicted to her dramatics and sexuality. The illusion not the real woman (as there was nothing real to love anyway). His character was just as unhealthy as she was but in a different way because if the man was truly healthy he would of never subjected himself or his children to that subtle and insidious abuse.
Fortunately, not everyone who interacts with us is attracted to the disease. Some people enjoy my intelligence, my tastes in music, my sense of humour, my sense of adventure. My courage. I don't allow people I'm in relationships with to over-extend themselves, if I become aware. I am maybe a little too much that way, actually.
I've talked to true BPD's, ASPD's and HPD's before and Aleithia just doesn't seem genuine to me. Maybe its not my ASPD buddy but this character's posts just seem too insightful to be from the mind of a borderline to me. They sound more ASPD like.
Well, my biological father's a contract lawyer...
Sorry, I'm the real deal. Diagnosed BPD and everything (I'm not happy about that, but that's the way it is). I was adopted, and the word Alethiea appealed to me from some writings by C.S. Lewis. Being able to know the truth, and remember the truth, is important to me.
But if you can't beat 'em, discredit them, right?
Cluster B's are emotional vampires because again they are takers, they take everything good from a person and then once that person is on cloud nine thinking they've met the most wonderful person they'll ever encounter, Cluster B sticks the knife in their back/heart and disappears in the night just like a vampire after feeding on too much blood. So to sum up they feed on a normal person's good emotions and feel what that person is feeling and when they are finally satisfied they can get no more emotions out of this person that will make them feel good like a vampire they move onto a new and fresh victim (but in Cluster B's case its out of boredom)
Now you seem to be confusing all of us with narcissists, who need continual re-affirmation and stimulation. I, on the other hand, am much more likely to bail when I get exactly what the narcissist would be looking for: Affirmation of love. I can sit and describe my narcissistic love in the most godlike of terms, and he'll just soak it all up. I love to say it, and he loves to hear it, and everyone's happy. God help us both if he then turns around and says, yes, I love you, I want you, because whether I like it or not, I will be immediately paralyzed with fear.
You really are mistaking choice, volition, with the disease. You don't get the most basic thing there is to get: We can't help it. We are not choosing to be what we are. If I had that kind of control over this, I wouldn't consider it an illness at all. It would be a choice. We could just clear out the shrinks waiting rooms, because hey, it's a choice.
But no, it isn't. It screws me up, makes me afraid when I need to be brave, drives me to be unable to remember things that are contradictory (in my mind, a bad memory of someone I love and a good memory are very hard to hold at the same time), and leaves me unable to remember the love of someone when I haven't seen them in awhile -- I have no object constantcy. Why would I choose that? Why would I choose to lose the memories that I need, turn away from the love I long for, drive away the people I need?
You are making the assumption that we are evil because you have this bizarre scenario in your head about how we live and interact with people. That's not how it is. Your theory is facile and glib.
I'm a life-long Christian. Let me just say, from that perspective, it's considered very, very serious to accuse a group of people of being evil. To say it about one person is bad enough, but to take a whole group and say that they aren't human -- you understand what you are doing? You recognize that this has been done before in history, to uniformly and singularily bad results? Do you see what you are doing?