Johnny-Jack wrote:I'm so upset to know that therapists and shrinks continue to diagnose cases of DID as something else, sending people in the wrong direction, setting up a false cure, writing prescriptions for medication that may provide a mere band-aid if the patient is lucky and it doesn't harm them. That holds whether your DES score ends up being 12 or 92 if they don't even bother to use such a tool. Why should people with DID like me escape detection when we seek help for problems we don't understand? It's ridiculous. The psychiatric and psychotherapeutic communities have a long way to go.
AAAAAGGGGGHHH!!!! I so totally agree with this and it is absolutely maddening! DID is by far not the only diagnosis that this is a problem for...
As for the DES score, Tylas is right that the score doesn't actually mean much. People with DID can score low, and people without it can score high. It's just an indicator for a T to look further into the specific questions answered correctly. Tylas is also correct in saying that professionals look at many things to make an official diagnosis (if they're actually bothering), and no one test can ever give a diagnosis definitively.
Johnny-Jack wrote:As for ego states or alters, there appears to be a continuum among everything I've read. I'm not suggesting the continuum is a straight but a complex cluster of symptoms and personal realities.
This is what I've been trying to say before. There is no black and white difference between DDNOS and DID, nor are there between "ego states" and "alters". There are different theories, and most of what is agreed upon is the idea of a continuum along which the degree of separation and dissociation becomes more distinct and severe.
Johnny-Jack wrote:At least one author (Kluft?) has made the distinction that time loss does not have to be happening in the present but it should have happened at some point in the past. And in some cases it can be the distant past. Switching and time loss can go dormant but the DID itself will not go away on its own nor will someone heal from it without work.
And, as for this, if the DSM-V continues as is projected, the amnesia requirement will not be required for the present so much as at least the past. So, this idea is becoming more accepted and mainstream.