i had a whole beautiful thing typed up here, and i accidentally clicked out, and now it's gone!
oh well, i'll try again.
in situations like this, it's *always* a case-by-case, alter-by-alter basis, in my opinion. i strongly disagree with the notion that no littles can consent ever, and based on my experiences with my system and other systems close to me, i prefer to treat my parts and other systems based on their alters boundaries/abilities/cognitive understanding/behavior/maturity/etc, and not how they subjectively identify in the inner world, age included. for example: i am the part that fronts the absolute most and handles the most of day-to-day life, including work, finances and many of our social relationships, both personal and professional. i identify as 16 in the inner world. my co-host, on the other hand, identifies as our body's age, but is wildly impulsive and disorganized. he also fronts far less than i do.
the thing about arguments saying that littles can't ever consent is that they completely fail to take into account systems like mine, where 2/3 of our co-hosts are between 14 and 16 years old. we have a lot of young parts in our system because a lot of our teenage trauma comes from infantilization/removal of autonomy and choice/massively overbearing parenting/dehumanization (unsure how to word the specific experiences i had), and we are desperately trying to get away from that by treating ourselves like adults, trying to let ourselves grow up, when we can.
so in this sense, my understanding is that it's less about how a part identifies, and rather based on other things. here are useful questions to ask:
1) are they using an intimate relationship to self harm, as a harmful coping mechanism, or as a manner of reenacting trauma?
2) are they are they using an intimate relationship as a way to please their partner, to avoid a (real or imagined) abandonment by that partner? or perhaps trying to use intimacy as a way to "fix" problems, such as having made a mistake or their partner being angry?
3) are they partaking in an intimate relationship because they feel like they have to in order to be "good", or some other reason telling them that they absolutely *have* to do this?
4) are they able to handle the emotional responsibility and labor of a relationship, such as the understanding of boundaries, the give and take, the communication, etc, without spiraling or becoming upset? can they understand their partner's boundaries and communicate their own? can they understand how/what to give and take in the relationship? can they communicate their problems effectively to work towards solutions for them? are they receptive to solutions at all, even?
5) are they able to stay in the present, and not too deep in past trauma for most of the time? are they able to avoid seeing the partner as an abuser or a savior from abuse that is no longer happening?
6) are they able to handle mature discussions, criticism, abstract and complex topics, all with more than a surface level understanding of what those things mean, even if the wording of the part's side of the discussion may be limited? as in, do they have the mental maturity to have adult discussions, even if the language that a child part uses is childish, limited or uses a lot of smaller words?
6) it's important to recognize that there are almost no sure-fire methods of keeping all alters out of the front completely while intimate relations are happening. of course, i'm sure you know this. it's also important to remember that some parts that are somewhat present for the activity may dislike or be neutral towards it, while others may actually enjoy it for whatever reason. all of these responses are okay, and natural for what the system has gone through and how the body reacts to intimacy like that.
7) all of these things apply to *all* alters within the system. not just littles, but all alters you can communicate with. obviously not all parts are receptive to communication, that's neither here nor there. but for the parts that you do know about and can communicate with, you need to be able to be sure that they can communicate their boundaries, their problems, and that they are not using a relationship or any form of intimacy to hurt themselves or reenact trauma. you should also be certain that they're present enough in the now, and not stuck in past dissociation and trauma as much as possible.
i don't care if a little in one system is in a relationship with an older part in another system as long as they've both gone over all of these things (and/or more if they can think of any) to make sure that both parties are in the headspace (no pun intended) to consent. in my opinion, the biggest sign that there is a problem in the relationship is when there is too much focus on the little's perceived age. when either party starts focusing too much on the fact that one part is a little, that is when it becomes a problem that could signify predatory behavior, and is definitely a sign that the relationship should stop.
however, at the end of the day, however you feel about the situation is not a "bad" one. if you're uncomfortable, you're uncomfortable, and you don't have to spend a lot of time justifying it. naturally, the other part might be upset, but it's not your responsibility to just be in a relationship with them just because. and similarly, if you're comfortable with it, you're comfortable. just as long as you analyze the part in question (and potentially yourself) and make sure that they're in the headspace to consent, and not pursuing the relationship if you've decided that they (or you) aren't.
take care, i hope you get it figured out safely.
collectively disasterjoy // he/she // autism + brain damage // (PF?) DID, 30 identified parts