ArbreMonde wrote:A friend of mine has set up some sort of statistical analysis of people who interact in DID spaces and the results are roughly that, the more you have knowledge of DID and set up to learn and heal, the less you need the community to validate you, the more you become critical towards the behaviors of the "validation only" people, the smaller your circle. It seems that healing is a mountain to climb and the higher you get the less people you find who are on the same level than you.
It's frustrating but the healed-er you become, the lonelier it seems to be.

Or maybe I'm the one becoming cynical here and/or misunderstood what the friend explained to me.
Hi, friend in question

You're going a bit further than the actual conclusion
First, note that the data are from the French side of the multiple community only - but the French side is quite influenced by the "extreme" sides of the English community. We have less diversity of opinions on the French side, compared to the English side.
The actual conclusion is that we (French speaking countries) have a community focused on experience sharing and validation seeking. One of the theme the most talked about to answer the "Do you want to add anything about the community?" question at the end of the survey was the legitimacy of systems and the importance of the "real vs fake DID" debates. Even the ones who like the community talked about this theme in a way or another (some to say the community was too much on this legitimacy question, others to say they think there are too much fake DID in the community...).
So people who perceive the multiple community in a good way like it for the experience sharing + validation-seeking purposes. They like finding people with the same experiences, the same POV, to see their symptoms be normalized.
The ones who perceive the community negatively think it lacks proper support, they don't find the resources and the help toward healing they hoped to find.
They are also 3 other factors that influence the positive vs negative perception of the community.
First, the "diagnosis status".
The self-diagnosed-only people are more prone to perceive the community positively.
The self diagnosed-then-diagnosed people start by perceiving the community positively, then within the range of 4 years, it totally shifts toward a negative perception.
I didn't have enough answers from diagnosed people to extract data out of it.
Second, the age of the person.
The younger (18-25) people see the negative aspects of the community, but tend to overlook it and focus more on the "sharing and validation". They see the community not in black-and-white, but more in shades of gray. The only defensive behaviors they talk about is not engaging in certain parts of the community.
The older ones progressively become more and more critical and defensive toward the community. The 26-35 starts to worry about how DID is seen on the medias because of the community, to identify precisely some members of the community as "The Problem", and to question the legitimacy of other systems.
The 36-50 are the one who see the community as a whole as toxic and sectarian, without any nuances in their judgment. They are the one who worry the most about the image of DID and DID community on the medias, and they focus a lot on the "are they real or fake DID?" question.
And third, the way the person use social medias.
The fact people have successfully built their own subgroup, and do not have to directly engage with the whole community on a regular basis, is another factor that allows them to see the community more positively.
So yeah, if your goal is healing, if you are in therapy, if you are older than 25, if you don't have a DID support group of a reasonable size that provide you good support, then you are more prone to see the community negatively and to feel isolated.
But ArbreMonde isn't wrong. If we think further, in a community based mostly on experience sharing and validation of symptoms, the more you heal, the less you have to share about your disorder, the more you have a chance to ends up alone if you didn't build yourself a friends group that can follow your pace.
And building a subgroup in a large community is extremely hard. People tend to think the larger the community, the easier to find friends, but that's not the case at all. The larger the community, the quieter people are. Only the louder ones are seen, and they tend to be the same on each social plateforms.
.
French person with ADHD
Former partial DID
Functional multiplicty, highly integrated