forever21 wrote:Although I have always had it I've not been in touch with the intense feelings associated with it until this morning. Am I correct?
Perhaps you are explaining something similar to what I will call my reframed memories. Rather than being denied retrieval to the entire memory, I was allowed access to the memory but only because I was able to interpret the memory as something other than what it truly was. Maybe for the benefit of the Phony False Memory experts we should call this reverse confabulation. This is similar to the semi-hypothetical I described as an encounter at the mall, but this is not a memory of an event that occurred during my amnesia, and instead this is a memory of an event that took place before my amnesia. I could recall having gone to pay an old lost friend a visit, but during the time of my amnesia I was denied access to the details of the event. What forgot was that this visit was not friendly.
As omnicell says, the process of repressing and then recovering is one of incredible enlightenment. No one gets to "know thyself," and to some extent others, better than the DD.
So how frickin ridiculous is it that we have memory "experts" giving talks and providing testimony about repression? The experts are us, not them. They are the idiots. They can't even wrap their minds around the concept of repression.
My psychologist friends might have been overly kind in describing their brethren as attempting to spare humanity pain by denying memories of bad things. Perhaps their primary interest is in sparing themselves pain, and not others.