Efragment wrote:A second opinion, kittensuppies, why on earth? Why would any of this be 'proof' of her not having this condition?
If your daughter mixed a to her scary thing on tv with a 'real life' memorie, the most important thing still is that she apparently was very scared by 'tornado' (or by something else that day). Ofcourse you validate those feelings. Always.
Thank you, Efragment. I was about to say the same thing.
Kittenspuppies, you have a way of saying things that triggers me almost every time. I know that when we have pursued the disagreement in the past and sorted it out, it has sometimes come down to semantics, or just that you have a way of thinking that works for you, and the way that you share it comes across to me as if you're saying that everyone should think that way (which I don't think you intend).
kittenspuppies wrote:I certainly wouldn't validate feelings if that trauma never actually occurred...
...Would I validate her memory of us actually being in the tornado - absolutely not. Was I going to reinforce any strong feelings due to falsely having a memory of actually being in a tornado - absolutely not.
There is a BIG difference between validating a feeling and reinforcing it. Validating a feeling usually helps to decrease the intensity of it, which is the opposite of reinforcing it. Of course you wouldn't validate the memory of something that didn't occur. But I don't understand at all why you wouldn't validate that tornadoes are scary, that it's very scary to think about the idea of being in a tornado, that it's scary to see a tornado, even if it's just on TV.
We're talking about not confronting a memory as being false if someone is adamant about it, but acknowledging the REAL feeling that they are having at the moment, and wanting to help them with the feeling.