by CopperMoon » Sat Nov 15, 2014 5:10 am
I think that regardless of which disorder is on the table, the higher functioning you are, the easier it is to have your issues overlooked. It's sort of sadly ironic, I guess, that the better you manage to do, the more likely you are to 'pay for it' by having your suffering and struggles overlooked. So I think it's always important to pay just as much (if not more) attention to what you experience and not just make a checklist of "things I've screwed up."
For example if a person experiences a lot of intense anger a lot of the time, but somehow manages through sheer will and self-stifling to never get into any physical brawls, then a question like, "Have you ever been in physical fights?" can completely overlook the issue. The person's answer would be "no" but that doesn't mean that they're not struggling with frequent intense, sudden bouts of rage. It just means that they somehow managed to restrain themselves and try to hide it. But are they less deserving of a proper diagnosis and treatment than the person who is less able or willing to focus so hard on restraint and does have a history of physical fights? I think both are equally deserving of proper diagnosis and treatment.
Regardless of whatever "labels" I wind up getting eventually, one thing I have realized so far in therapy is that I am often so good at hiding my emotions and presenting facades, and do it so automatically, that I have probably qualified for such "labels" for a very long time, but was too covert and hellbent on being so. I rarely made it "obvious enough" to cause people to come rushing in to the rescue or anything.
Like I notice that you say you've only had one relationship so far. While you acknowledge that it was dysfunctional with several break ups, strong emotions in you leading to you being manipulated, etc - you defend your doubt about BPD by saying you've only that one relationship. I'm not meaning to make this sound accusatory but only trying to offer up a possibility to consider: My relationships have also mostly been very chaotic and dysfunctional with many breakups. However I haven't had a serious relationship in years now. I don't really think that means I don't have problems anymore, but rather that I at some point I just started avoiding dating in order to avoid the problems. So for me to say "I haven't had a crazy, unstable romance in years" would be kind of misleading, since it is also true that I haven't had a serious romance in years, hehe.
I also don't think having BPD means that you must be storming around the city punching in windows and swearing at everyone /s. Most articles I've read (not to even mention the comments below them) seem really melodramatic and demonizing of BPD (which probably makes sense from the angle that there are a lot of NPD exes out there of BPDs ha, so the devaluation is probably just as intense coming as it is going). But as with all mental illness and disorders, the most extreme cases possible get painted onto everyone as though it's the norm. I think sometimes people are 'less interested' in the average case of a disorder because it's not as "sensational" and paints a more empathetic, human picture, which requires more complex understanding and effort. Even classic Narcs at the end of the day are still human and suffering at their cores.
I for one think that if you have BPD even though you don't frequently trip balls all over the place, that it's important for you to represent, to show that it's a spectrum, and also so that people more severe on the spectrum can see what progress can look like, what things can look like well before they are "totally cured" or whatever.
Just my 2 cents opinion.