invicta wrote:kokoroharu wrote:What is normal? What is "not losing my mind"? Reality's different to all of us, but we consider someone insane only after s/he acts different from certain norms created by society or terms we all agreed to be normal.

I have to disagree. I've read stuff like this in this forum a few times, and I just can't see it that way. There is a normal range for everything. Anything that falls outside that range is not normal. That doesn't mean it's necessarily a bad thing, but it means it's not normal. As in, most people don't fall in that range. If a person has an IQ of 200 is it normal? No. If a person has three legs, is it normal? Of course not! First time I was depressed I was 10 years old. Was it normal? Not by a long shot! I don't think that means I was losing my mind, but it certainly wasn't normal.
kokoroharu wrote:You just have to ask yourself what is "sane" for you and what is "insane"? Why do you think that just because you think differently or have multiple thoughts and visions at the same time you're going insane? Accept who you are and make peace with BP. The more you're afraid of going insane, the more you do go insane.
The concepts of sane and insane cannot differ that much from person to person. I know these words are unfortunately linked to a lot of stigma, but there has to be a common definition. Call it being mentally healthy and mentally unhealthy, maybe these are softer terms, but there has to be a general agreement on what constitutes mental illness. The thresholds are fuzzy, as in everything. Still, if someone is experiencing hallucinations and a physical exam comes up empty, it's safe to say there's got to be a mental problem.
I don't know. To me, normal is a very abstract word. People who are supposed to be normal often have their own quirks. One thing is what we really feel and other what we show to the world. There is no such thing as normal. I believe the term "normal" itself is abnormal, because who and where decided what's normal? It's like when you read from the magazines "be happy, try to be happy". Oh, go ... yourself (not you, invicta, I meant magazines). When you strive to be normal at any cost, eventually it'll cost your sanity + n, or what's "left of it". We should accept that we have people who are different, act, feel and do things differently.
Depression or physical illnesses, of course, are not normal, e.g. our brain/body is not meant to function like this, but one can't say that in case of BP or asthma, six fingers or one kidney, that person is automatically abnormal and should therefore be excluded from the society, or that he or she is permanently damaged. We're not living in ancient times anymore. Rules of our society have changed quite a bit. You don't cast away a member of your family if s/he has an illness, do you?
Mental illnesses become "not normal" when a person is no longer able to do everyday chores, becomes danger to other people and so on. But I agree with you as well. Particulary:
"Still, if someone is experiencing hallucinations and a physical exam comes up empty, it's safe to say there's got to be a mental problem."invicta wrote:kokoroharu wrote:Meds help, but in the long run problems are in your head and need to be solved.
No, they are not! Saying that something like this is "in your head" diminishes the problem and makes it sound like it's the person's fault. Like "oh, this is all in your head, you just need to be stronger". If you're diabetic, is it all in your head? No, it's an illness, same as bipolar, borderline, schizophrenia, you name it.
The most important aspect of all mental disorders is that the subject itself acknownledges the problem, if it's present, and seeks help or wants to find a solution, even if tests show everything is peachy.
I absolutely did not mean that it's anyone's fault, but I've had my share of psychiatry and psychology studies, as well as adult learning, alternative practices and so on, and what I can tell is that meds do help, but that person who takes them must be able or willing to make some changes, too.
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Einstein
For example: you take meds year after year, but don't change your overall routine. Same places, same four walls, same thinking patterns ... What changes can you expect then? And I don't mean anything radical, just taking some small steps. Finding out what are your likes and dislikes, what you can eliminate from your life, what to gain etc. Meds and therapy go hand in hand, but therapy can't be just talking about what's wrong, it should include cognitive therapy and motivation which comes from the inside, motivation that's gradually built.
invicta wrote:Ok, I'm sorry, I'm probably coming off as very aggressive, and I'm sorry. I'm sure you're trying to be helpful and trying to give some comfort to zetamex, but I'm sick and tired of reading stuff like this, like normal doesn't exist. It does! I'm not normal, I know I'm not, normal people don't behave like I do, don't think the same things I think, don't feel the same way I feel. That doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad thing, although most of the time it is. It means just exactly that - behaviour and everything else follows a normal distribution and I'm way off the average. There, I said it all. If it's too much, I'm sorry.
Why're you sorry?

You just pointed out your beliefs and views, that's a good thing. Better than nodding along. And if by your definition not normal is what you've shown in this last paragraph then I'll take it any time over all those "normal" people.