by inverse » Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:17 pm
I think it's just as dangerous to try to self-diagnose yourself with AvPD based on 12 lines it the DSM as it is to diagnose someone else. People truly can't see what's going with themselves most of the time. If they knew what the problem was, they would fix it, or stop repeating whatever self-destructive behavior.
And if you google a list of aspects about yourself, that's even worse. No one would say they have cancer because they looked up "fatigue, changes in bowel habits, and hoarseness." That's way more likely to be a sign of a hangover, but they're also listed as general symptoms of cancer online. And yet if someone googles "why do I avoid people?" they immediately accept the label that pops up.
You can't objectively tell how much it's affecting you, especially compared to the standard for a PD. You don't know if you have something else entirely. There could be something that doesn't bother you enough for you to look up that is the hallmark of a whole different diagnosis. You need someone who has studied the whole book, not just a paragraph online, to correctly identify what's going on.
And most maddening of all, you could "self-diagnose" with AvPD, which has no treatment and no cure, and stop right there, when in fact you really could have something else that could be cleared up with a daily pill or a short course of a specific therapy. If that's the case, and you cling to your "self-diagnosis" (which really means there is no diagnosis) then you're cheating yourself out of your whole life.
But it's a real handy excuse. It absolves you of any responsibility of working to get better. And like the OP, who hasn't shown up again, which means she probably got a clue that it wasn't AvPD in the first place, she can pretend "it's not me, I'm not uninteresting, I don't have deal breaker qualities that my crush will never be able to look past, THEY are the one with the problem, and I'm a martyr for looking past it."