riderwaite wrote:This is not a matter of interpretation, it's clearly stated - and I didn't make the rules, I'm just reporting on them.
The ICD-10 doesn't say this though, so there is no reason to accuse anyone of lacking knowledge in their field.
When the problems of one disorder are addressed (for example with AS the environment is adapted to benefit the person's needs and sensitivities, sensory issues are addressed etc.) and the ADHD symptoms still prevail then there is nothing to say that the PDD is actually causing the symptoms.
The fact is that there are many people with AS or other PDDs who do NOT have any ADHD-type problems at all (some people with AS are even able to focus and concentrate above average, in fact it is often a part of why interests can be so intense and prevail for so long), so AS can't reallly be 'blamed' for ADHD type symptoms in
everyone who has AS and ADHD type problems.
Because if AS by default caused these symptoms then the vast majority (if not everybody) of people with AS would by default have the symptoms - but clearly, they do not!
Indeed, there are many Aspies with ADHD problems who react really badly to ADHD medication (so yes in those cases one can assume another cause other than ADHD), but in those who do react well there is nothing to say they cannot have both.
The same goes for social problems etc. in someone with ADHD - being inattentive or hyper is bound to affect your social skills and understanding (including language processing), but a skilled diagnostician is able to tell the difference between social problems that stem from impulsivity or from lack of attention, and social problems that originate "deeper down" along the neurological chain.
It is the narrow-minded diagnostician who is too lazy to do a proper assessment and blames every problem a child or adult experiences on whatever the diagnostician specialises in, who is lacking in expertise, not the other way around - although of course as always there are exceptions!
Seriously though I would MUCH rather visit someone who actually understands their specialist area of research (and thus knows for a fact that both can occur in the same person) than an "expert" who only diagnoses based on a checklist and who refuses to accept what they see in front of them just because the DSM iV says it can't exist. (Just remember the DSM changes with every revision, because we find out more about these matters all the time - if the DSM actually contained all there is to know about disorders then we would be dealing with *just* the DSM not DSM IV

)
28 y.o. female with HFA and "attentional dysfunction"
"While not clumsy, she does walk into things" [My neurological report...]