Rules of Attraction for a Psychopath

crystal_richardson_ wrote:then why don't ALL men buy those fake, but lifelike orifices that resemble a female's vagina?

the female body itself provides the visual, and how she animates herself and what she says completes the experience; men need more than a hole I think...without everything else they won't even get it up.

you said it yourself; the hole itself is minimally attractive.

crystal_richardson_ wrote:people have sex because they will get made fun of if they don't.

I think as individuals most people at least start out thinking that sex is sacred, but then due to conformity socialization this attitude slowly gets eroded, and once you lose your virginity and in the context that many often lose it (drunk, at a party) it's pretty much gone.

I'm not saying we should deny homosexuals sex, I'm saying we should let them live in their own community so the majority are not repulsed by it or have to pretend to be tolerating.

justonemoreperson wrote:

Mr. No One wrote:I know what I said I was there when I said it. My logic is sound. You should look up the word contrived that would help. The way homosexuality is presented in modern times is contrived. I live around a lot I mean a lot of homosexuals and have spoken to them about it many times. Personally. That is where I get my info.

I'm aware of what contrived means. Your earlier posts were unclear; they made it sound like you believed that homosexuality itself was contrived - In other words deliberately created and artificial.

If you were talking about homosexuality generally then you'd be making the claim that all homosexuals were effectively pretending to enjoy shoving their dicks up other men's sh1t-holes just for effect; which is simply not true. I don't believe that "being gay" is done artificially (I'm trying to keep to the dictionary definition here, to avoid confusion), neither do I believe it was created deliberately for some purpose. It happen naturally, in as much as the person has little control over their sexual orientation.

If you were making out that the culture (how it's presented) around homosexuality is a modern phenomenon then I take issue with this also. Its culture has been prevalent throughout history, including having a prominent role in many lifestyles, recorded for posterity.

You seem to be under the impression that your understanding is better than mine as you have personal experience with talking to gay people. I also have friends, work colleagues and family members who are gay, so I feel I can comment on modern lifestyles with some confidence. However, none of my gay family members who were alive during the Roman empire are still alive, so for that I have to rely on history books.

Mr. No One wrote:Yes throughout history gay sex was what it was. An exercise of debauchery, pleasure and power. Now it has been packaged into the family next door who love each other and should have the right to be married so on and so forth. You know the whole "I was born this way so you need to treat me special bullsh!t." Like everyone who has gay sex was born to do so, yet the gays I know try to turn others gay on a daily basis yet if you try and turn them straight it is an injustice. People are not being truthful with themselves. It is social engineering run amok with a dash of political correctness. I don't appreciate it.

Oh good we are getting somewhere.

justonemoreperson wrote:

Mr. No One wrote:Yes throughout history gay sex was what it was. An exercise of debauchery, pleasure and power. Now it has been packaged into the family next door who love each other and should have the right to be married so on and so forth. You know the whole "I was born this way so you need to treat me special bullsh!t." Like everyone who has gay sex was born to do so, yet the gays I know try to turn others gay on a daily basis yet if you try and turn them straight it is an injustice. People are not being truthful with themselves. It is social engineering run amok with a dash of political correctness. I don't appreciate it.

This has nothing to do with the gay "thing" though, it has to do with the way society is evolving generally.
For example:
Not so many years ago duels were legal - you could shoot someone to defend your honour. Now they're not, so people can go ahead and dishonour each other with impunity.
Education used to be a privilege, now it's a right and so it gets abused by children who see it as a punishment.
People who couldn't pay their way used to be sent to workhouses or into debtors prisons, now there's a welfare system, which people see as a rite of passage.
Murder used to be punished by hanging, now you can be back on the streets in a few years.
Gay people used to be treated in mad houses and punished, now they're allowed to get married and celebrate their new found rights by waving it in your face (An unpleasant mental image).

It's social evolution and it will get worse in every aspect as rules are made for the sake of civility and come down always on the side of the minority.
I'm afraid that my being a working white man, born to the country I'm living in with a wife and children will eventually become the new "minority" and may eventually require some for of legislation to defend my rights.

Oh good we are getting somewhere.

Try making your original posts a little clearer if this type of exchange frustrates you.

justonemoreperson wrote:Not so many years ago duels were legal - you could shoot someone to defend your honour. Now they're not, so people can go ahead and dishonour each other with impunity.

Education used to be a privilege, now it's a right and so it gets abused by children who see it as a punishment.

People who couldn't pay their way used to be sent to workhouses or into debtors prisons, now there's a welfare system, which people see as a rite of passage.

Murder used to be punished by hanging, now you can be back on the streets in a few years.

Gay people used to be treated in mad houses and punished, now they're allowed to get married and celebrate their new found rights by waving it in your face (An unpleasant mental image).

I'd say society has improved over the years.

justonemoreperson wrote:I don't understand what it changes though.

There are many things I dislike about the way society is today, many of them affect me directly.

Gay's mincing around doing their thing doesn't affect me directly so I tend to ignore it; I don't have a strong opinion on it one way or the other.

Would your opinion change if one of your kids turned out to be gay and decided to live the lifestyle you're discussing?

Mr. No One wrote:And so what I am saying is, particularly with the gay thing, it is presented in a way that I do not find genuine. Our children think they are gay because they liked Tommy grabbing their penis and Susie rubbing their clit. It is ridiculous. If you have any sexual attraction at anytime I'm your life towards your own gender you are gay. Lol but yet gays fuk women and lesbians fuk men all the time. It is just to me so convoluted and they like to put this gay thing in a nice litte pink packaging for you to swallow. No thanks you can save that sh!t for the sheeple.

Mr. No One wrote:I responded to Yuripee way back when cuz I disagreed. JOMP it is called a discussion. I am participating in that discussion. Pretty simple stuff.

Edit: I think I know what you are going for now it has just come to me.
You wonder why I have a problem it? Right? With its presentation?