Rules of Attraction for a Psychopath

mmmmm

Tasteful.

Yeah, the socks are great, I've been soaking my feet in kosher salts that's how banged up they are...

You give an inch, they take a mile... across the board... well... yeah...

But what is it that makes sex so taboo, that two women or two men shouldn't engage in it? And it has nothing to do with being an imperfect species, societal burdens have changed significantly in just the past hundred years, men can be openly gay, women are in the workplace etc etc, sex is now so common place, it is more of a recreational activity than a sacred act.

Not long ago, a virgin was seen as pure and virtuous, male or female, it was desired until you met the one with whom you spend your life. Nowadays one is mocked for not having engaged in sex. Times change, people change. Sex just happens to be pleasurable enough that reproduction is a second place prize. But people think they still live in the dark ages.

It always was a recreational activity, it seems only recently that the rise of asexuals has backlashed against societal pressures to do what is "proper". They simply do not want to deal with all the $#%^ that ruins it...

Even tax payer money is used to blow a hole in the side of young mothers, yet the 30 somethings are having crippled babies.

It's in the culture too... not every region is the same... I mean population control is the order of the day in many developed nations who are still clinging onto 16th century economics.

I am not an economist. Just saying...

So the rule of attraction is best left shrouded in mystery... why does government have any say what-so-ever in a wasteful economy?

If we get into the thought police, anybodies guess is as good as mine... I simply do not understand where one persons business invades another, in terms of recreational sex.

Maybe in cultures where sex is profitable and legal, sure... I might see that corruption.

A large portion of society is still in the dark ages, in terms of ownership of sexual properties.

Not to confuse the two issues, but gay marriage is still a massive issue in the USA. Morals are high agenda, for politicians and whoever... they rarely seem to voice it on the internet though. imo...

Then you've got Jerry Lee lewis which is a staple of American culture, and 30 40 years later, the fobs, bible thumpers, and righteous alike still have a say in the controversy.



LOL!!!

It's the web... no two people have the same mindset... however I'll argue that the active participants have a much narrower field of view.



Anyways, Jerry Lee Lewis, he married hs cousin didn't he?

Well... let's count all the middle aged highly edumicated folks with asberger children...


That's got hurt, my apologies to all the Ms.Parkers

But what is it that makes sex so taboo,

YyYyY...

Right? Nice alt... same attitude...

In other words, you answered your own question... the taboo is a mystery to yourself... and you feel the pressure from everyone else. It's catch 22.

You can't speak away a "taboo".



In any event, to my knowledge, they've really slammed the breaks on earlier childhood sex education, they're tip toeing around the sexual workers laws delicately, have legalized same sex marriages destroying whatever sanctimonious value it's supposed to grant high society types, and polygamy.

I just wanna point out that the whole "homosexuality is illogical from an evolutionary stand point" thing is not even that true. There have been shown to be species that used homosexuality as an adaptive mechanism for population control. When the food is limited a species that reproduces without a cap and with not predator that can keep that population grown under control, eventually runs out of resources and gets extinct. On the other hand, the species that had a significant portion of homosexual animals managed to survive as they had a decent amount of individuals not reproducing and thus keeping their numbers in check. My bottom line is, homosexuality - like psychopathy - is an adaptive characteristic given the right proportion between the majority and minority. (I've posted an article that explains how that works for psychopathy a couple of times.)

This is a homosexuality thread?

People are attracted to raunch sex encounters, so burn them at the f'g stake and get it over with.

My bottom line is, homosexuality - like psychopathy - is an adaptive characteristic given the right proportion between the majority and minority. (I've posted an article that explains how that works for psychopathy a couple of times.)

You are either over educated, which I doubt, or you come from a culture where order is the highest valued societal norm. Like sneezing in public spreads the plaque and stuff. Cover your mouth, wear a condom, choose your partners carefully, and make sure that you get so much practice with yourself that you totally f'g suck at it through the rest of your life...

Me personally, and what I'm "attracted to" is seperate from marriage, sex, or anything really.

Jesus, when it comes down to sex and only sex, gender isn't even an issue, and neither is looks.

Most people have a giant retarded spot inside their head though and cannot separate trains of thought or logic.


For all the losers, sex is a badge... for all the winners, it's not something they discuss in the public spotlight...

And for all the bwatty boys and girls, well... sex is drugs...


Attraction is essence... if it's anything else, you went to school for the wrong thing.



Anyways, sex, and I mean what I consider to be one of the best sexual encounters ever... if you only knew guys... and you can't have it...

So go and strap on a sex toy and worship pussy...

Whoops I meant get your partner to strap one on for you...

justonemoreperson wrote:

Mr. No One wrote:Homosexuality is contrived. Always has been.

That comment surprises me.

I think it's fairly well established that in most cases a person's sexuality is not by choice, a person doesn't choose what they're attracted to. The same applies to paedophiles; most of them hate themselves for wanting sex with kids; they can't help their wants and they have to help their actions. I'm not linking gays to kiddy-fiddlers, just using it as an example to show that sexual preference is not a contrived choice.

In fact, many people who are gay can spend years trying to hide the fact if they live in a social environment which forbids it.

Does this explain your view that it's contrived? We all know that god hates poofs, so is it part of your belief in god that makes you think that they decide to be gay? If they can't help it then god can't hold them accountable, but if they can help it then it can be a sin.

Okay God has nothing to do with my comments. And fairly well established? Since when? We all know just because you desire something doesn't mean you need it. Homosexuality the concept in modern times is totally contrived. The whole concept of what it is and it's not a choice and it needs to be accepted and blah blah blah. At no time in the history of mankind has homosexuality been practiced this way. BTW, I'm not trying to debate the morality of people's sexual preferences. This is not a moral exercise.

Mr. No One wrote:Okay God has nothing to do with my comments. And fairly well established? Since when? We all know just because you desire something doesn't mean you need it. Homosexuality the concept in modern times is totally contrived. The whole concept of what it is and it's not a choice and it needs to be accepted and blah blah blah. At no time in the history of mankind has homosexuality been practiced this way. BTW, I'm not trying to debate the morality of people's sexual preferences. This is not a moral exercise.

Normally your posts make reasonable sense, but your comments about this are complete bollocks.

You didn't say "needed", you said "contrived."
It's not a modern phenomenon; it's well reported throughout history (there are even numerous references to it in your bible).

People are attracted to stuff whether it's natural and beneficial or not. It's certainly not contrived.
Is there something / someone in your family which prompts you to make these statements, because they're not consistent with your usual common sense?

The primal mindset of males is something like: "Is that a hole? I can put my dick in there!".
The idea that one hole is better than another has been decided later by society. :­P

Obsidian wrote:The primal mindset of males is something like: "Is that a hole? I can put my dick in there!".
The idea that one hole is better than another has been decided later by society. :­P

Is that true though? Certainly I've had friends who would support your theory, but in humans, as well as most animals, the male is naturally drawn to the female and vice-versa.
There are anomalies, which leads to other sexual attractions, but generally animals are attracted to that which supports its species.