PCL-R (for fun)

kanin wrote:

The_King wrote:What if the shrink is a childhood friend and I helped him pass the test? As a licensed shrink he now has access to PCL-R and was trained to conduct it. It really doesn't matter though, now that I took it, I know how to get 0-5 if the situation calls for it.

You guys should know that I am no one's sucker.

Ooo look, he's delusional too!

Why the hell would you go to such a length? The only instance in which you may be forced to take it would be if you get caught for something and if you were smart enough to pull that off (which I doubt) you could have spent your time focusing on something far more interesting and a hell of a lot more fun. It sounds like a complete waste of time to me.

I would agree my statements are usually derived from deception. But I do not think I am delusional in the psychological sense.

Why? Research and training. As in self-improvement. Keep in mind I am still in my lower 20s, so the topic of myself is very interesting. I assume you should be bored since you obviously should have more experience thus practical and theoretical knowledge. What interests you? As in what activities do you consider productive?

Sunlight_hurts wrote:A detail of him being a childhood friend would have entered your initial post if it was true, as that literally, changes everything. You also spoke of him very distantly in your first post (Again, if he was a childhood friend, it would have been much more personal, rather than just "My psychologist" a name would have been present, or "my friend the psychologist". Previous words defeat your current ones) On top of the fact that it's extremely frowned upon for psychologists to work on anyone with a personal relationship, as personal relationships can lead to emotion based error, and in a lot of places, they won't allow it, and they can actually lose their license to practice psychiatry/psychology. Your story is falling apart.

Nice try.

No because only idiots reveal personal details that is irrelevant to the discussion. Why would anyone be more personal to me? As in to me everyone is ranked based on utility.

He owns his own practice. Why would anyone know? Ever heard of patient/doctor confidentiality agreement? I also would like to know why you think I wouldn't have aliases?

kaotikone wrote:Wow, way to paint yourself into a corner there, God. Go on! Tell us next about how through some superior manipulation and theatrics, your "psychologist" threw sand in the eyes of everyone and took you under his wing despite the strong and often enforced laws regarding "conflict of interest".

'tis better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt.

Just did. Again why would anyone find out?

"To avoid criticism do nothing, say nothing, be nothing."

Elbert Hubbard US author (1856 - 1915)

Adding random quotes to look "important". Boring game.

The_King wrote:

Sunlight_hurts wrote:A detail of him being a childhood friend would have entered your initial post if it was true, as that literally, changes everything. You also spoke of him very distantly in your first post (Again, if he was a childhood friend, it would have been much more personal, rather than just "My psychologist" a name would have been present, or "my friend the psychologist". Previous words defeat your current ones) On top of the fact that it's extremely frowned upon for psychologists to work on anyone with a personal relationship, as personal relationships can lead to emotion based error, and in a lot of places, they won't allow it, and they can actually lose their license to practice psychiatry/psychology. Your story is falling apart.

Nice try.

No because only idiots reveal personal details that is irrelevant to the discussion. Why would anyone be more personal to me? As in to me everyone is ranked based on utility.

He owns his own practice. Why would anyone know? Ever heard of patient/doctor confidentiality agreement? I also would like to know why you think I wouldn't have aliases?

Your first statement doesn't make sense. How does, "No only idiots(hostility, indicator of stress) reveal personal details that is irrelevant to the discussion" relate and or counter to anything i said? None of the info that you should have said is irrelevant to this discussion at all(in fact, it's extremely relevant, as it changes the entire situation, literally). Nor is it all that personal. How is him being a friend of yours overly personal, if anything that would be a nifty bonus, not something you hide. You left it out because it's a fabricated fact that you decided to add after, along with this new "He owns his own practice". You would have put that in when you fabricated him being a personal friend, if it was at all true. Added facts to a statement are 99% of the time false.

Now he owns his own practice? You do realise you've gone from "just some psychologist" to, a personal friend who is a psychologist (against every rule) to a personal friend who is rich enough to own his own practice, and by your story, he was a child hood friend, so he has to be within 5 years of you, and you've now stated you are in your early twenties, which makes him at most 25-28, in which time it would be impossible to establish his own practice, you can only make those once you've gotten your name out there via working in a hospital or clinic. And, FYI even those with their own practices are monitored and have bosses they have to report too (and they too, are bound by the rules/laws of psychology). He will be a personal branch of some psychiatric group, or a hospital. I could point out more wholes and fails in your story, but that would be over kill.

~ Thegreatest returns.

Your first statement doesn't make sense. How does, "No only idiots(hostility, indicator of stress) reveal personal details that is irrelevant to the discussion" relate and or counter to anything i said? None of the info that you should have said is irrelevant to this discussion at all(in fact, it's extremely relevant, as it changes the entire situation, literally). Nor is it all that personal. How is him being a friend of yours overly personal, if anything that would be a nifty bonus, not something you hide. You left it out because it's a fabricated fact that you decided to add after, along with this new "He owns his own practice". You would have put that in when you fabricated him being a personal friend, if it was at all true. Added facts to a statement are 99% of the time false.

Now he owns his own practice? You do realise you've gone from "just some psychologist" to, a personal friend who is a psychologist (against every rule) to a personal friend who is rich enough to own his own practice, and by your story, he was a child hood friend, so he has to be within 5 years of you, and you've now stated you are in your early twenties, which makes him at most 25-28, in which time it would be impossible to establish his own practice, you can only make those once you've gotten your name out there via working in a hospital or clinic. And, FYI even those with their own practices are monitored and have bosses they have to report too (and they too, are bound by the rules/laws of psychology). He will be a personal branch of some psychiatric group, or a hospital. I could point out more wholes and fails in your story, but that would be over kill.

~ Thegreatest returns. [/quote]

You did get the hostility correct, but isn't that typical for a fella my age? You mistake the stress for excitement and enjoyment, or isn't that technically stress to the body so same thing?

I don't remember saying any of that. I blame the substance I was under for not thinking clearly, so now that we established the fact that the psychologist is a childhood friend of mine would that make my story plausible?

Why within 5 years? Could he not have been a god father or mentor? Again what makes you think I would pretend to know him in public, especially at the clinic? We actually play a game usually when we travel to totally make up our identities like in Wedding Crashers. It makes for good practice.

You wouldn't refer to a mentor as a childhood friend, you'd refer to them as a mentor. -.-

Sunlight, I don't think it'd be overkill. This guy just doesn't get it.

kanin wrote:Sunlight, I don't think it'd be overkill. This guy just doesn't get it.

He does. This is called a "Test". Thegreatest likes them.

Ohhh...well then he's failing.