thriver wrote:We have a high emphasis on extended family. We are a nation of mixed races, particularly pacific islanders and Maori so 'tribal' is well known to me also. In some cultures here it is normal to share the raising of children between extended families and tribes.
I stand corrected.

Americentrism at it's best.
It seemed as though you were referring to the atomic family in the description, which I do have a problem with as the only accepted social unit. The best thing that happened to my parents with regard to their marriage, was getting divorced, for example.

In America, at least, there is an insane amount of pressure towards that specific model. Mother, father, married, with children. Anything different is given a hard time in the system.
Imagine an unmarried uncle who is the primary and full-time caretaker of the children in the household, and so, is unemployed. Unless he is disabled, he cannot even be added to either parents medical insurance policies. The same would hold true for a grandparent in that position. This is illogical. Family values pundits cry out for someone to be at home with the kids, but are unwilling to create a system which allows it to be financially feasible. I come from an background where such an arrangement is not unheard of, and take a offense at this lack of inclusion and consideration of other cultures in the development of this decision.
I am interested in hearing if things are better in New Zealand.