by vcrpamphlet » Tue Nov 12, 2019 4:58 am
- What does friendship mean to you? How do you define someone as a genuine friend. What qualities do you value in them?
Haven't thought about it that way. They're all different.
- How long have you had your current friends for and why do you continue to maintain a relationship with them. What purpose do they serve? And is your friendship with them genuine. Why or why not?
Always had the same long-term friends. Never had a false friendship last very long.
- Would a psychopath have genuine friends and maintain that friendship long-term? Why do you think they would or wouldn't?
Of course they would, lol. Why wouldn't they?
- Have you ever been friends with a psychopath? If yes, why do you think that friendship exists, and do you believe it's genuine?
They don't exist in a way these kinds of questions can be asked - like they're Martians, or whatever. It's verb rather than noun: intelligent/sadist borderlines can learn a psychopathic style the same as born nothing-feelers do (who without reliable emotional feedback, carry pre-adolescent selfishness into narcissism). Actual emotionlessness isn't untrue, but might be BS with respect to antisocials.
Friendships with classic psychos like the type everybody here gets hard about (i.e. cold/angry/fearless/cynical under a congenial social mask, etc): they're mutually beneficial for a bunch of reasons. Mostly they just show how normal they are. If you can detach from the emotional rigmarole of ordinary middle-class people to begin with, there's nothing strange about the duplicitous Machiavellian stuff - it's just wanting a reaction that'll help offset an anger problem going on unconsciously, or whatever. Screwing with other people's personality algorithms is a weird kind of strength-game, in a way - so if you're a bit psychopathic yourself (with some detachment control), friendship with another psycho can be extremely handy.
NTs are easily swept up by false heuristics so they tend to get hurt more often than necessary. If you're open-minded and nonjudgmental (in a detached kind of a way) then chances are a psychopath will eventually reveal themselves to be fairly child-like underneath, especially wrt to their intellectual security. In terms of friends in the real world, feedback has been that I "see" them properly, or something, which they're usually unfamiliar with. In turn, they're playful and help me get off my arse.
"Psychopaths" on psychforums are more the cerebral neurotic kind. Can understand a self-confident reptilian visiting or maybe finding some of it useful reading, but the issue with traditional Dutton/Hare psychos is they're low in amygdala feedback and so require way more stimulus than online self-image masturbation can generally give. Psycho ADHD extroverts, unless they're otherwise debilitated, would sooner stab themselves than spend all day in a room reading text symbols. One that I know must've had sex with 15 chicks the past couple months, and a whole group of people circles him like he's Vin Diesel from the first Fast&theFurious - and he's always interacting with someone.
Good-value psycho friends are exactly like James Steerforth. The point (in person) isn't how little they feel inside: it's how they make up for it through their assertion of will; how dynamic and endurable and muscular their will is and how much their mental exercising is benefited by being around your particular mentality. Amazing how small a deal it all is when the BS gets stripped away, and it's just a person in front of you.
On the other hand you have posters like Nasty_Boy who said people don't realise how dangerous sociopaths are, even sociopaths should avoid other sociopaths. In that worldview sociopaths sound like psychopaths with depression - a depressed psycho is the last person you can rely on probably. But a content one getting regular blowjobs will just seem either ADHD or narcissistic or both.