Governing dynamics of socialization revealed

AmirElAchmed wrote:Can we at least agree on that?

Sure, jealousy works but it sets a bad precedent and creates drama. There are better(not to mention calmer) ways to have good relationships without resorting to making a woman jealous. I wrote about that here - https://www.psychforums.com/post2163749.html#p2163749

Also,

AmirElAchmed wrote:Incite Jealousy
Force Union

this statement is a contradiction. You either make a woman trust you or you make a woman jealous. You can't do both.

RogueKing wrote:

AmirElAchmed wrote:

AmirElAchmed wrote:Incite Jealousy
Force Union

this statement is a contradiction. You either make a woman trust you or you make a woman jealous. You can't do both.

Beautiful.

You basically illustrate my point exactly.

And that's the paradox of sexual attraction and gratification.

Often times - when chicks see a guy they like - they hate him, because they like him.
That is - flared emotions.

I guess that's what is so misunderstood about sex.

Its inextricable link to emotions - high emotion; how volatile that is.

Which is almost certainly why there is such a grand mal divide between men and women, that one culture (subculture) after the next, has tried and failed to come to terms with.


But in regards to the "can't do both" statement;

That's the curious thing.

I don't make the rules - I believe - in fact, not I believe - it's a mathematical fact, that there is an underlying pattern to EVERYTHING in the universe.

There is no true random.

This approach - is predicated on the use of cues.

The maximum number of cues the consciousness can process, is 4.

More than 4 - it's overload and the system fails.

As to emotional relevance - there are exclusively 4 words in the English vocabulary - that have emotional relevance.
Remember - not allude to emotions - but when they are spoken to oneself, in terms of how they make the person saying them feel - how they resonate - there are only those four words.
Nothing else of relevance.

-- Mon Jul 23, 2018 3:51 pm --

RogueKing wrote:

AmirElAchmed wrote:Incite Jealousy
Force Union

this statement is a contradiction. You either make a woman trust you or you make a woman jealous. You can't do both.

And frankly - I'm delighted you have observed this.

If you try to "incite jealousy" - say your behavior reflects an attempt to do this with, I dunno - some gal.

She'll resist - because it's like, an electric cable.
That flared emotion - it's like an electric cable and she don't want to be electrocuted.

So when you subsequently "force union" - well - she can't resist (within reason).

And that electricity lights her up like an all night liquor store.

Sexual gratification.

I disagree with most of what you say but I'll end my participation in this discussion by stating that,

yes, making women jealous can work and it's good to use it situationally. But striving to make women who don't deserve it jealous will only work on broken, insecure women and it will develop a dysfunctional relationship which will eventually cause her to rebel out of spite not to mention the rship will go nowhere.

Me? I'd rather my rships be meaningful and supportive and seek to overtime increase the trust, bond, and intimacy we have in each other.

I stay away from excessive drama and insecure women. No thanks.

RogueKing wrote:I disagree with most of what you say but I'll end my participation in this discussion by stating that,

yes, making women jealous can work and it's good to use it situationally. But striving to make women who don't deserve it jealous will only work on broken, insecure women and it will develop a dysfunctional relationship which will eventually cause her to rebel out of spite not to mention the rship will go nowhere.

Me? I'd rather my rships be meaningful and supportive and seek to overtime increase the trust, bond, and intimacy we have in each other.

I stay away from excessive drama and insecure women. No thanks.

Kool and the gang.

To each his own.

But allow me to respond to your closing statement with my opinion that - in this life - you harness jealousy - or it harnesses you.

You use it to your advantage - or you fall victim to it; and to me personally - the latter is pretty much intolerable.

I'll harness it and use it and be happy and administer it with good reason and intelligence - rather than fall victim to some egocentric floozy who basically uses it like a twat uses a shotgun; just blasting randomly and gratuitously.

No thank you.
I ain't no floozy's doormat.

it seems to me like youve been hurt by women and now choose to not be a "victim" and "doormat" by using this grand strategy you've outlined.
I know it might be hard for you to believe but it is possible for a man to love and cherish women and have these women love and respect and devote themselves to him back while still remaining strong. I hope you can discover what that feels like someday.

rk

RogueKing wrote:it seems to me like youve been hurt by women and now choose to not be a "victim" and "doormat" by using this grand strategy you've outlined.
I know it might be hard for you to believe but it is possible for a man to love and cherish women and have these women love and respect and devote themselves to him back while still remaining strong. I hope you can discover what that feels like someday.

rk

This sounds like something someone who basically has the inability to give women an orgasm would say.

I wonder if these kinds of hypomanic idea spurts ever produce anything legitimately inventive. They probably do occasionally through random chance, but the intensity of the genius-prophet complex would surely derail any chance of the process being effective or reliable. I'm not sure if Eckhart Tolle is any smarter than the OP, but they could be equally deluded, just one got luckier with the message they happened upon.

vcrpamphlet wrote:I wonder if these kinds of hypomanic idea spurts ever produce anything legitimately inventive. They probably do occasionally through random chance, but the intensity of the genius-prophet complex would surely derail any chance of the process being effective or reliable. I'm not sure if Eckhart Tolle is any smarter than the OP, but they could be equally deluded, just one got luckier with the message they happened upon.

The depths of my genius cannot be fully comprended by mere mortals.

This will change the face of socialization and human interaction the world over - obliterate cultural divides, racism, inhumanity, promote productivity and well being and a forward thinking global society you can't even imagine.

We're about to change things!

Sh1t's about to get real!!

EVERYBODY FOLLOW ME!!!!!!


























LEAVE YOUR VALUABLES...... WE''LL COME BACK FOR THEM LATER!!!

I am going to follow that person over there instead. I have no idea what his ideas are but I have heard yours and at this point I am willing to take the risk.

Jimmy Dreggs, you return.

Doesn't seem like too much has changed. Still trying to work your magic on women without much success, I see. Still searching for the perfect combination of words?

Maybe better to give up your cues and codes, and just try working on being your best version of your own natural self. This engineered program of yours didn't work before, and still won't work.

Hope you don't resort to the schematics again. That was hard to take.

antisocial-personality/topic96737.html?hilit=Jimmy%20Dreggs