CreamFreak wrote:PavlovsPuddyTat wrote:I am not sure what you mean with your last sentence though. You are welcome to explain that.
I'm just saying that over analyzing text can be counter productive in a place where you can't put a face to the words. It's harder to tell if someone is full of sh!t online than it is offline. You seem to be new, for this day and age at least. A lot of us have seen different phases of different personalities, and it is always a task in itself to keep up with. So, trying to dissect such posts may be a waste of time.
So what are you actually saying here.? AsPD may be full of people that are full of $#%^. Since there is a possibility that people are full of $#%^ we should not analyse their texts too much.
For me this way of reasoning is completely bizarre to be honest. I am not saying it is wrong, I just find it strange. You are not the only one thinking like this, I have come across this in various places. I have a completely different view on this than you do. You are entitled to your view of course just as I am entitled to mine. We have just a different way of seeing this corner of our social reality.
So when I pick up a book from a shelf I should read the text with high suspicion. I should not be suspicious about the text as such and the contents of the words.
The only reason why I should be suspicious is because I will never meet the author who died 200 years ago and will never be able to assess the truthfulness of the text because that person was unfortunately born 200 years too early to become exposed to my expert judgement of human behaviour.