Our partner

Member Nominations

Antisocial Personality Disorder message board, open discussion, and online support group.
Forum rules
Attention Please. The AsPD FORUM IS CLOSED.

The AsPD forum is closed for an indefinite period of time pending discussion of member usage, and relevance of the forum, and for revision of the forum's policies. We ask that you NOT to take AsPD threads and discussions into other forums here. This will result in being permanently banned from the forums and will only result to a longer period of forum locking or a permanent shut down. Please respect the safe spaces that those forums represent for other members here.

The Team

Re: Member Nominations

Postby Reaper » Sat Sep 17, 2016 11:13 am

julllia wrote:yes because people here have attachment problems and problems in having emotional connections.so is really difficult for me to understand dominance or leadership.because the person i would want to follow is someone i love or respect only and noone else.
i mean if people do not have these emotions,everyone is for himself.noone can lead. how you choose the dominant.?noone really is?


To be a leader you have to show strength and I really don't see how having an emotional connection to those you're leading is showing that.

Do you think a military leader has an emotional connection to the soldiers he's leading?

He doesn't, yet they still manage to respect his position of authority and dominance. If he was an emotional person, I doubt they would respect him as much.

Emotions can make people weak.

Emotional connection is not appropriate for every situation involving dominance and leadership.
Last edited by Reaper on Sat Sep 17, 2016 11:25 am, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Reaper
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 24201
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:34 pm
Local time: Tue Jun 17, 2025 2:05 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)


ADVERTISEMENT

Re: Member Nominations

Postby crystal_richardson_ » Sat Sep 17, 2016 11:17 am

jules,

that's not true.

the most dominant person in a group is the strongest or most capable and who have goals worth supporting because they benefit everyone.

they lead by example, and they inspire, and people strive to be like them as all move toward the common goals and all gain as everyone grows and matures and becomes stronger and happier together.

like Joseph Smith.

love and respect? i think you are confusing a partner with a leader. a partner can be a leader in a relationship but it's not quite the same thing as is being discussed here.

a leader isn't really the person who should be satisfying emotional needs, unless that is like the purpose of the group, but usually it's not. emotional needs are bet satisfied by people close to you....fiends...family...partner...etc
crystal_richardson_
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 37173
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:55 pm
Local time: Tue Jun 17, 2025 3:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Member Nominations

Postby julllia » Sat Sep 17, 2016 11:27 am

ok respect.how am i going to respect and admire someone who is completely egotistical and doesn’t care for me.or for the generall good or progress. if he doesn’t care or benefits me i wouldn’t follow or respect.
there are a lot of conversation about soldiers ,how they just follow rules without thinking and are stupid.and i could never do that.for example if your military leader commands you to rape someone,you shouldn’t follow his rules like a robot.
julllia
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2016 9:53 pm
Local time: Tue Jun 17, 2025 5:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Member Nominations

Postby Exempt » Sat Sep 17, 2016 11:50 am

I'm back bitches.

Firstly, reaper and crystal, assuming you're not the same person (I get the same whiff of desperation from you both) can you two either STFU, ###$, or kill each other already. Your childlike back and forth is disgusting, and feels like an attempt to somehow redeem yourselves to us all - I would mindfukk you both again myself as punishment but you're both such pariahs there's not even any fun in it anymore.

As for the quotes from other members referencing me, I'm not sure I agree with any of them but am intrigued and interested in your reasoning.

Will Incandenza wrote:Exempt could well be the most sociopathic out of everyone, but there's fuk-all to go on, so it's just as likely he's the least.


Why? I agree there's very little to go on, none of which you can verify, so what are you going on exactly?

Will Incandenza wrote:Who is the least constructive poster:

Until recently, Exempt & streaM Freak


Why?

Mrs Brightside wrote:Who is the most intelligent:

Dazz/Five/Exempt/BigO



Why?

-- Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:57 am --

FunnyRainbow wrote:
- Who has the worst avatar: Exempt



Is this because I made fun of you for being gay? No hard feelings, it was all fun and games :lol:

Seriously though, if you think I have the worst avatar you have no taste.

Shame on you.
May you find what you are looking for.
Exempt
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 11:15 pm
Local time: Mon Jun 16, 2025 10:05 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Member Nominations

Postby Reaper » Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:02 pm

julllia wrote:ok respect.how am i going to respect and admire someone who is completely egotistical and doesn’t care for me.or for the generall good or progress. if he doesn’t care or benefits me i wouldn’t follow or respect.


If he or she doesn't have an emotional connection to you that means they're egotistical?

If you were stranded with a group of strangers on a remote island and someone in the group decides to lead because they're the most dominant in the group. He (the leader) doesn't give a shlt about anyone else. He only cares about his own life, but he doesn't go off on his own because he knows that getting the group organized will benefit his survival more.

Would you not follow his lead simply because he has no emotional connection to you?

if your military leader commands you to rape someone,you shouldn’t follow his rules like a robot.


Rape that sometimes happens to civilians during war does not usually happen because a military leader commanded it. It happens because the soldiers doing it chose to do that themselves.


Exempt wrote:I'm back bitches.


And now you can fuk off again for bitching like a whiny little kunt.
User avatar
Reaper
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 24201
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:34 pm
Local time: Tue Jun 17, 2025 2:05 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Member Nominations

Postby Dulcet » Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:17 pm

Exempt wrote:
Why?


You get the things everyone else is too autistic to get.
User avatar
Dulcet
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 7300
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 3:50 pm
Local time: Tue Jun 17, 2025 3:05 am
Blog: View Blog (2)

Re: Member Nominations

Postby julllia » Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:32 pm

sorry i can’t quote.he still benefits me.if i follow him i judge that i will gain something from his abilities ,so he earned my respect and i follow.i’ll sabotage him if he makes me with violence and rebel .only if i believe in him i follow.
i said rape because they are many films about soldiers and this subject.i think soldiers are stupid like this.i do not follow anyone like a robot and blindly just because he is the command.i have to respect him and agree with his aim/plan.
. if there is no trust or respect we will sabotaze eachother at some point i think
julllia
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2016 9:53 pm
Local time: Tue Jun 17, 2025 5:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Member Nominations

Postby Eight » Sat Sep 17, 2016 2:12 pm

Reaper wrote:
Eight wrote:You may want to consider some of the stuff she wrote when she was GodandGoddess, BetterThanYou, or TheGreatest, some of her earlier names here -- those names she chose for herself say something about her mindset.


Who are you claiming those are the old usernames of, me or crystal?
They're certainly not mine. I don't even choose usernames like that.
I think she's talking about you, crystal. Are they your old usernames?


These aren't your past names, Reaper -- you'd never chose these names. You portray yourself as far more dark, evil, demonic, and choose names/avatars that support that view of yourself.
They are some of crystal's old usernames when she first came to the forum and posted as a young male; he told the forum his name is Chris. One of the reasons that some people still call her Chris. Eventually, when he kept getting banned, he became 'crystal_richardson', a female.

This is a glimpse into how crystal views herself -- a god or goddess, far better than you, the greatest --superior, aloof and disdainful of society, rejecting that which she feels has rejected her.

What do you do when you are rejected? You either suffer (with your belly on the cold earth, etc), or you eventually create a schema where you aren't the rejected but are the rejector... you castigate society and those who participate in it (those lowly workers who have a job, etc) and rise above it all in your superior position of refusing to participate. That superiority schema hurts a hell of a lot less.

At least you're honest, Reaper, when you say you don't work because you can't hold down a job for more than a few weeks. That might not be praiseworthy, but at least it's more honest than saying you don't work because working is too common for you and you'll suicide if you ever have to get a job, like crystal says.

crystal_richardson_ wrote:i remember anti :)
i don't recognize that other person though..
is that suppose to be me? :shock:
yikes

Nice deflection without denying.

TheGreatest doesn't sound at all like you. Different use of language to yours.

Nope. That's early crystal. All bragging superiority and disdain for others... until she'd fall apart and post in self-defeatist terms, or huge pink letters yelling at herself or at the forum for not paying attention to her, though now that I'm remembering sometimes it would be soppy song lyrics as well. I know you remember this, Reaper. She's still the same but she's toned it down a lot so that blatancy is rarely seen now. But the separatist superiority is still quite evident, though it is only there to cover up the depths to which she feels empty and nothing and useless.
User avatar
Eight
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 5401
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:18 am
Local time: Mon Jun 16, 2025 7:05 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Member Nominations

Postby Reaper » Sat Sep 17, 2016 2:25 pm

Eight wrote:
TheGreatest doesn't sound at all like you. Different use of language to yours.

Nope. That's early crystal. All bragging superiority and disdain for others... until she'd fall apart and post in self-defeatist terms, or huge pink letters yelling at herself or at the forum for not paying attention to her, though now that I'm remembering sometimes it would be soppy song lyrics as well. I know you remember this, Reaper.


Oh yes, I remember that at least and all her other meltdowns. I remember her even asking people to call her names and abuse her at one stage.

She's such a fuking weak bitch.

She's still the same but she's toned it down a lot so that blatancy is rarely seen now. But the separatist superiority is still quite evident, though it is only there to cover up the depths to which she feels empty and nothing and useless.


I wonder why she hasn't killed herself yet. I doubt it would take much to push her over the edge.
User avatar
Reaper
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 24201
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:34 pm
Local time: Tue Jun 17, 2025 2:05 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Member Nominations

Postby streaM Freak » Sat Sep 17, 2016 2:42 pm

.
Last edited by Ada on Tue Sep 20, 2016 9:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: .
streaM Freak
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 6:16 pm
Local time: Tue Jun 17, 2025 3:05 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Antisocial Personality Disorder Forum




  • Related articles
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests