Member Nominations

by **streaM Freak** » Sat Sep 17, 2016 3:04 am

No.

I'm drinking and talking to people who assume i pay as much attention to detail as they do.

It's a huge buzz kill.

-- Sat Sep 17, 2016 3:05 am --

Mind what?

What crystal said to put down your assessment of reaper ("you haven't been around long enough; you haven't read her stuff over years as we have": paraphrased) is true of her. Reading her 30,000 current posts and her posts under other names gives a pretty clear view.

Your PM to her was decent and nice. You could have just left it there; probably would have been better for you. She doesn't do decent and nice. You've learned that now.

You may want to consider some of the stuff she wrote when she was GodandGoddess, BetterThanYou, or TheGreatest, some of her earlier names here -- those names she chose for herself say something about her mindset.

Here's one:

Post by TheGreatest » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:28 am

TheGreatest wrote:
I have accumulated many user names on this site that have long been abandoned. They are the carcasses of past personae, representing various incidences that resulted in my banning and subsequent reincarnation.

antisthenes wrote:
chris [aka: crystal] is/was a particularly annoying troll we deal with here from time to time....

TheGreatest wrote:
What's wrong daddy...can't handle the competition?
competition is all well and good. though i'm not sure what we're supposedly competing OVER. the problem is when the discussion fails to rise above name-calling and four-letter words. the major difference between yourself and i, is that i prefer discussion to pointless posturing. to be sure, occasionally the mood strikes you and you post something worthwhile, but i honestly think you do that by mistake.

Aww...daddy figured his little girl out. I would post more "worth while" contributions if you numskulls would actually engage the material instead of just derailing it with comedic drivel.

It may inspire you to go back in time through the long-abandoned threads of this particular forum Antisthenes, where you will find posts in which the intellectual depth and relevance with which I partook upon first joining this site 1 and 1/2 years ago was quite engaging, thought-provoking, and salient to say the least... traditional forms of entertainment have given way to ephemeral nonsense and kids who so lack stable identities that they must mockingly join a mental health forum to find equally misled individuals with which to socialize. Why should I invest in intellectually stimulating posts when my audience are middle-aged children, hmm? This is not a nonexclusive social forum. It is supposed to be a haven and place of understanding for those that fit no where else, yet it has been polluted with the ignorance of the masses...reduced to a pissing contest.

You scum have no idea what it means to suffer, to be convulsing on your bed in panic attacks and fear that your senses will once again leave you. Perhaps that is why you are unable to lift yourself from your basement of boredom Antisthenes, you have not felt death, you have not felt the cold earth against your stomach as you wait for it to envelope you in its dark embrace. And nor have you experienced life. How could you? You are too busy running, you coward. Because you are too afraid to carve a meaningful path for yourself, you must sustain your pathetic existence by suckling on the breast of whims. You sit idly, with your cowboy hat and forgotten dreams and ask us to dance for you Antisthenes, but we do not dance for free and you have nothing give.

by **crystal_richardson_** » Sat Sep 17, 2016 3:51 am

i remember anti

i don't recognize that other person though..

is that suppose to be me? :shock:

yikes

by **crystal_richardson_** » Sat Sep 17, 2016 4:19 am

Your PM to her was decent and nice. You could have just left it there; probably would have been better for you. She doesn't do decent and nice. You've learned that now.

it's not that i am not a nice person. i can be nice...it's just both of you are totally imposing your expectations on others

there is no reason to end the discussions in this thread. they are constructive discussions of our perceptions of each other.

but for some reason you seem to take our disagreement as something that needs to be 'smoothed over' and 'at the end of the day let's be friends and make nice'

i am sorry but i just don't cater to that, i have no incentive to make you feel more comfortable disagreeing with me.

there is no need to hug and make nice after every little disagreement lol

the issue is you don't feel in control of me emotionally and you're trying to pass it off as me being unreasonably mean and indecent

a very borderline tendency.

i am not going to cater to your BPD. sorry Will..

by **Reaper** » Sat Sep 17, 2016 6:07 am

Eight wrote:You may want to consider some of the stuff she wrote when she was GodandGoddess, BetterThanYou, or TheGreatest, some of her earlier names here -- those names she chose for herself say something about her mindset.

Who are you claiming those are the old usernames of, me or crystal?

They're certainly not mine. I don't even choose usernames like that.

I think she's talking about you, crystal. Are they your old usernames?

crystal_richardson_ wrote:i remember anti

i don't recognize that other person though..

is that suppose to be me?

yikes

I remember anti too. He was an interesting poster.

TheGreatest doesn't sound at all like you. Different use of language to yours.

by **julllia** » Sat Sep 17, 2016 9:46 am

in

g with me.

there is no need to hug and make nice after every little disagreement lol

i am not will ,i mean this was not for me.and i haven’t read the whole thing. but i am thinking
generally if i fight with someone i do not care much about him.we are not friends after and i don’t want to be but i am not angry anymore. like i am only angry that moment of the fight. and i find it much more enjoyable. because i do not give a $#%^ anymore after. and the other person are angry forever and can’t get over it. so kind of torture himself.

are you fighting who is the most dominant here.anyway i think someone to be a leader or dominant is not enough to be the most violent
or. nutcase.he had also to be respected be reliable and useful and stuff.
i want to be submissive but only to who i love or respect.all the others i do not give a $#%^ about.
how are you going to be dominant if you do not have any emotional conection with people. people would not want to follow you.
they must want to follow you,and not do it because they are afraid but hate you inside.
i find reaper dominant too. because her answers are helpful even if she doesn’t care
btw the people who are fighiting who is dominant are all very rememberable,so that is a compliment, .half the other people who you voted i do not remember or know at all, as new person.

by **crystal_richardson_** » Sat Sep 17, 2016 10:18 am

the issue was never who was/is the dominant poster, it was the insinuation that reaper had a dominant personality generally by some people.

which i found laughable.

i never suggested i wanted to usurp anyone's role, or that i was competing for the award for most dominant poster

i merely found the insinuation that reaper had a dominant personality generally laughable.

by **crystal_richardson_** » Sat Sep 17, 2016 10:40 am

julllia wrote:how are you going to be dominant if you do not have any emotional conection with people. people would not want to follow you.

personally, i am not very motivated to follow people who chiefly work off emotional connection to gather followers, though it's situational.

because this is ultimately a weaker power as not all people are responsive to it, it has a limited scope of influence, and i cannot believe in such a person to pull through or inspire others when the going gets rough...

it depends on the aims of the group, but as a rule if i can dominate someone i won't follow them. and i am immune to emotional connection/influence (as are many others - some of whom are enemies), so they have to have something more substantial.

emotional connection is lower level power. it is the power to keep things going as they are and keep people together, rather than forge new paths or find new treasures.

or even just protect someone. emotional connection won't protect you..

in the end it's useless, and only useful to the emotionally needy, who are too weak to be anything more than narc supply anyway for their leader.

by **julllia** » Sat Sep 17, 2016 11:04 am

yes because people here have attachment problems and problems in having emotional connections.so is really difficult for me to understand dominance or leadership.because the person i would want to follow is someone i love or respect only and noone else.
i mean if people do not have these emotions,everyone is for himself.noone can lead. how you choose the dominant.?noone really is?

Member Nominations

Re: Member Nominations

ADVERTISEMENT

Re: Member Nominations

Re: Member Nominations

Re: Member Nominations

Re: Member Nominations

Re: Member Nominations

Re: Member Nominations

Re: Member Nominations

Re: Member Nominations

Re: Member Nominations

Who is online