Member Nominations

Will,

do you know what the spirit of a post is? it's understanding its meaning in the flow and context of conversation...sometime that's generally lost in retrospective analysis of a thread

this isn't a legal document. trying to analyze everything i say word for word - and only with consideration of my words and not the spirit of the post at the time it was written - is not only to error but waste your time.

i can't believe you put together that post. you must enjoy the exercise...you're nuts

no, despite saying 'to be honest' which is vaguely sarcastic if not seizing the opportunity to say something in response to you calling me a pain in the ass, my real purpose in posting is not to be a pain in the ass

although you should know that a proper debate usually is a pain in the ass...as it's not meant to validate but invalidate the other person's perspective...so if you don't like pain then maybe avoid such debates!

but yes you completely lost the spirit of my posts last night...i'm sorry. however, if you favor in your words 'confirmation bias' then carry on.

but i think most people knew not to take what i said there totally literally...

although it's like the more you accuse me of such the more it feels like it's true...and i even begin saying things in the direction of 'it is!' because i am so suggestible lol

but in retrospect of yesterday i know that not to be true. you are putting words or meanings or motivations in my mouth and i am becoming them.

but that absolutely makes no sense in light of my posts generally, because most are not even annoying. again with your biased birds eye view and butthurt over getting outgunned in the 'what is psychopathy?' thread.

i think all of this is just you continuing to react to that butthurt..

and now you may accuse me of annoying you...but like what do you want me to say? lol

hahah block of text last sentense am i annoying i have a good guess but i will never know

So with that context, let's review crystal's response to my PM, which was: no reply (I wasn't expecting or wanting one). But, she did post in this thread:

which you (in error) took as an unexpected response to your email and which then became the impetus to your response on here

it was not a response to your email. my real response to your email was 'what?' as i saw no impoliteness on your part.

so it just left me puzzled and left it as i leave most people's emails. (i respond to like maybe 20% of emails)

and then i opened this thread and realized i did leave something hanging the night before and addressed that.

now, am i continuing to annoy you because i won't concede you're right which you are trying to be in response to being wrong in the 'what is psychopathy?' thread despite saying being right doesn't matter?

whats ur malfunction dawg

show me your clit

crystal_richardson_ wrote:but that absolutely makes no sense in light of my posts generally, because most are not even annoying. again with your biased birds eye view and butthurt over getting outgunned in the 'what is psychopathy?' thread.

i think all of this is just you continuing to react to that butthurt..

Oh, that's not what happened at all.

I stopped responding to you when your avoided all reasoning given, saying Andy McNab was only claiming to be a psychopath to sell books. He writes books consistent with his career as an SAS, not psychopathy (just one co-authored with Kevin Dutton; a massive leap to make).

Meaning, you suddenly became an idiot, and it seemed like a waste of time.

You're not playing this game very well.

Oh guys its a game

what placve am i in?

it's not a game, i am literally being totally truthful.

maybe...you're projecting?

crystal_richardson_ wrote:it was not a response to your email. my real response to your email was 'what?' as i saw no impoliteness on your part.

so it just left me puzzled and left it as i leave most people's emails. (i respond to like maybe 20% of emails)

and then i opened this thread and realized i did leave something hanging the night before and addressed that.

Can't dispute that, so fair enough. Only a minor point of my post though.

Will Incandenza wrote:and irrespective of her being ASPD or sociopathic or edgy for some other disordered reason

Crystal doesn't have AsPD or sociopathy. I would say she's histrionic and somewhere on the narcissistic spectrum if anything.

She was diagnosed with PD NOS apparently, which was probably pretty accurate.

crystal_richardson_ wrote:it's not a game, i am literally being totally truthful.

maybe...you're projecting?

Sure it's a game. One I happen to behaving authentically in, but a game in the sense, who really gives a sh|t.

This is just exercise for me, at the end of the day.

Heading out for the afternoon so won't be able to reply again until later.