Why do you stick around this forum?

crystal_richardson_ wrote:
He has emotional needs similar to mine. We understand each other.

Does he know you're on a forum telling people he is that f*cked up?

CrackersnCheese wrote:

crystal_richardson_ wrote:
He has emotional needs similar to mine. We understand each other.

Does he know you're on a forum telling people he is that f*cked up?

What's the reflection in that woman's eyes?

Yes, you are wrong. I didn't even know my posting yesterday had a particular impact on either of us.

And what conversation, exactly, are you referring to?

Wait a second, wasn't it you who said you gave up on love? That the reason why Jomp being unable to love you in the 'normal' sense is not a problem for you is because that is no longer a relationship expectation for you?

And now you're saying your relationship is superior in love?

Mr. No One wrote:

CrackersnCheese wrote:I feel for you Crys because you will never have what I have, you will always fail, especially at love.
You can't succeed at something you know nothing about. I reckon the root you have now would be doing you just for the laugh saying to his mates "yeah, she's loose but gives decent head, it'll do for awhile". You will never have anything substantial.

I don't agree with this. Just like she doesn't know about your relationship and the in and outs, you don't know about hers. I don't think she was insulting you.

Opinion is your's Mr No One, What I read throughout her comments was more of a "ohhh lets try piss Jompy off" than a serious concern for how we work.
My reply to her stands and I do believe that with the way she says she is that she will never have the level of relationship I hold right now.
This is not the first or attempt she has made at belittling it and it won't be the last. It has been explained to her before and yet she continues.

CrackersnCheese wrote:

crystal_richardson_ wrote:
He has emotional needs similar to mine. We understand each other.

Does he know you're on a forum telling people he is that f*cked up?

I don't say he is 'fuked up'.

And isn't that the purpose of this forum?

CrackersnCheese wrote:

Mr. No One wrote:

CrackersnCheese wrote:I feel for you Crys because you will never have what I have, you will always fail, especially at love.
You can't succeed at something you know nothing about. I reckon the root you have now would be doing you just for the laugh saying to his mates "yeah, she's loose but gives decent head, it'll do for awhile". You will never have anything substantial.

I don't agree with this. Just like she doesn't know about your relationship and the in and outs, you don't know about hers. I don't think she was insulting you.

Opinion is your's Mr No One, What I read throughout her comments was more of a "ohhh lets try piss Jompy off" than a serious concern for how we work.
My reply to her stands and I do believe that with the way she says she is that she will never have the level of relationship I hold right now.
This is not the first or attempt she has made at belittling it and it won't be the last. It has been explained to her before and yet she continues.

Actually I thought it was a pathetic attempt to get him to abuse you in some way by challenging his manhood.

So what's the reflection in that woman's eyes?

crystal_richardson_ wrote:

CrackersnCheese wrote:

crystal_richardson_ wrote:
He has emotional needs similar to mine. We understand each other.

Does he know you're on a forum telling people he is that f*cked up?

I don't say he is 'fuked up'.

And isn't that the purpose of this forum?

How can you have this relationship, Crystal? You've mentioned that you can't form attachments and that you hate any form of compliment or positive comment. You've indicated that this guy is part of your overall plan and that you use him to get what you need while hiding who you really are.

I understand that he may be "perfect" for you in the sense that he's gullible and complies with your need to have him watch you sh1t in the garden, but surely this isn't a stable, loving relationship?

CrackersnCheese wrote:This is not the first or attempt she has made at belittling it and it won't be the last. It has been explained to her before and yet she continues.

Crackers, jomp is a self-proclaimed reality-junkie. I am only challenging his perception of the relationship.

I am NOT belittling it. If you two are happy - and the openness of Jomp with his condition in the relationship is admirable and obviously a step up from previous relationships - then that's all that matters.

I was only pointing out an inconsistency that I saw between how Jomp perceives the relationship and the reality.

I was actually hoping to hear more from Jomp...not you speaking for him. Do you feel the need to?

crystal_richardson_ wrote:
I was actually hoping to hear more from Jomp...not you speaking for him. Do you feel the need to?

Maybe she's speaking for herself Crystal. Interesting how you see everything as a power play and a need though.

justonemoreperson wrote:but surely this isn't a stable, loving relationship?

It's our own kind of love. We understand each other, we meet each other's needs.

Is he replaceable? Yes. But it wouldn't be a cakewalk if I had to.

-- Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:15 am --

justonemoreperson wrote:

crystal_richardson_ wrote:
I was actually hoping to hear more from Jomp...not you speaking for him. Do you feel the need to?

Maybe she's speaking for herself Crystal. Interesting how you see everything as a power play and a need though.

I know but this is about you.

Her rushing in to speak for you kind of signals that you can't or shouldn't entertain what I am suggesting.

That she doesn't want you too.