Psychopath "Victim" forums

MrOmega wrote: there is a Psychopathy sub-forum,

justonemoreperson wrote:

MrOmega wrote: there is a Psychopathy sub-forum,

No, there isn't.

Plot against Hitler
Main article: 20 July plot
There had always been opposition to Hitler in conservative circles and in the Army, the Schwarze Kapelle (Black Orchestra), but Hitler's dazzling successes in 1938–1941 had stifled it. However, after the Soviet campaign failed, and the Axis suffered more defeats, this opposition underwent a revival.

Rommel was approached at his home by Wilhelm Burgdorf and Ernst Maisel, two generals from Hitler's headquarters, on 14 October 1944. Burgdorf informed him of the charges and offered him a choice: he could face the People's Court or choose to commit suicide quietly. In the former case, his staff would have been arrested and his family would suffer even before the all-but-certain conviction and execution. In the latter case, the government would assure his family full pension payments and a state funeral claiming he had died a hero. Burgdorf had brought a capsule of cyanide for the occasion. After a few minutes alone, Rommel announced that he chose to end his own life and explained his decision to his wife and son.

The official story of Rommel's death, as initially reported to the general public, stated that Rommel had either suffered a heart attack[85] or succumbed to his injuries[86] from the earlier strafing of his staff car.

During Rommel's time in France, Hitler ordered him to deport the country's Jewish population; Rommel disobeyed. Several times he wrote letters protesting against the treatment of the Jews. When British Major Geoffrey Keyes was killed during a failed commando raid to kill or capture Rommel behind German lines, Rommel ordered him buried with full military honours. Also, during the construction of the Atlantic Wall, Rommel directed that French workers were not to be used as slaves, but were to be paid for their labour.[104][e]

justonemoreperson wrote:The problem with having a diagnosis is that, once people know, all of your human rights disappear.

My first wife was on one of these forums, spouting off about how sh1t her life was, all because of me. No one mentioned her personal responsibility to take control of her own life. Once you have a diagnosis you're always the one to blame - even for the stuff that has nothing to do with you.

The sites like this are pointless, as the sort of women who want to get bullied and pushed around by the likes of me will let themselves do it because their very nature is that they don't make good decisions.

Glue wrote:

justonemoreperson wrote:The problem with having a diagnosis is that, once people know, all of your human rights disappear.

My first wife was on one of these forums, spouting off about how sh1t her life was, all because of me. No one mentioned her personal responsibility to take control of her own life. Once you have a diagnosis you're always the one to blame - even for the stuff that has nothing to do with you.

The sites like this are pointless, as the sort of women who want to get bullied and pushed around by the likes of me will let themselves do it because their very nature is that they don't make good decisions.

This in a nutshell. The people who like to paint themselves as victims are truly the "psychopaths" here more than anyone, their selfish need to pass blame on, to free themselves from guilt, what better person to blame everything on than the one person they know can take it?
My mother had gotten wise to this, she would normally blame me for every failing in the house, missing money, broken obects around the house etc etc. Disguising her obvious accusations with "well intentioned reasoning," to conclude it couldn't have POSSIBLY been anyone else.
If i took the money I would say, if i broke something i would say, not to clear my conscience but because those things don't register as something i need to lie about. It would be akin to me leaving money somewhere and being asked if it was mine and then lying about it.

Victims who do it to themselves, and assume every man or woman who has used them or abused them, fits the profile of a psychopath.

A quick search for "Identifying a psychopath" yields some hilarious results. They seem to be written as a spy novel, "The psychopath makes his way into your life, he feeds off you...." Blah blah blah,
as though this is a standard to be measuring ALL those who fit into the category one way or another.
We have a name for that, it's called stereotyping, it is a bigoted view from people who happen to make up the majority, and they call us the monsters. Frankly they all deserve it.

Contrast wrote:Is psychopathy a modern boogeyman?