I am wondering what your opinions are on the argument of Pharmaceuticals compared to other drugs that are often marketed as supplements and therapy alongside these "milder" drugs.
From what I can tell, there are a great deal of drugs that have only a few side-effects, and those side effects are transient. I am talking about drugs such as piracetams and a few of the other racetams, high dose methylene blue, low dose psychedelics, and the various plants that have significant effect on the brain.
If you go to pubmed, there are a wealth of articles about how effective piracetam is at treating depression and anxiety, and how it is completely safe with absolutely no long-term side effects. Yet, the first choice for depression and anxiety is SSRIs which are know to have significant side-effects, can be toxic, and can even have long lasting effects, especially on libido.
The nootropics like piracetam work by stimulating electrical activity in the brain, and potentially encouraging the brain to change (I think more research is need on the neuroplastic effects in humans, though).
Drugs like SSRIs and Benzos only increase the inhibitory functions of your brain, allowing you to sidestep the problem, not overcome it.
To me, the benefits of the nootropic drugs and the research behind them should indicate that they should at least be prescribed as an initial try or something at least to see if it will work for the patient.
It seems to me that nootropics should be the way to go, and especially useful if coupled with therapy, so why do you think SSRIs and Benzos are prescribed instead even for minor issues when they are very dangerous drugs?