Hearing voices is voice to skull

Copy_Cat wrote:

Cliff Huylebroeck wrote:First there were dozens of websites dedicated to this idea alone. All these websites said for a fact that it's a mental illness. They didn't consider any other possibility.
http://www.hearingvoices-is-voicetoskull.com

"If I talk to God its called praying, If God talks to me its called schizophrenia" I never wrote on your topic before cause I never heard voices but I have "travelled" for lack of a better word.

I don't buy this voice to scull thing, I would consider mabey spirits, ghosts ,demons, angels, telepathy psychokinesis, aliens ? and mostly misunderstood extra-sensory perception way before man made radio waves just to mess with people. It just makes no sence to do this VTS even if it could be done.

It can be done and there is evidence that the SS gestapo first invented it, all they have to do is access the auditory part of the brain with the waves. Copy I know you love to investigate, be my guest.

What if you previously have schizophrenia symptoms before getting voice to skull? The combination of the two can be confusing.

Hi.
I dont want to be rude, but clearly Cliff is schizophrenic it seems, and he doesnt want to deal with it this way.

The way he is writing indicates cognitive decline, he is paranoid, he is making up huge conspiracies and he is hearing voices.

Cliff, dude, go to a really good psychiatrist and see what you can do about it.

Why don't you type voice to skull into a search engine. I think you'd be surprised by how many websites and links you will find devoted to this "conspiracy".
...

yes it is true.
the original device worked with two different ultrasonic sounds. the difference between the two sounds is modified to be that of a voice in the audible range. while you cannot hear the ultrasonic sounds, you can hear that difference and thus a voice inside your skull. this has been out for over 50 years.

the latest implementation of it uses microwaves to do the same thing which is being done by the military. the latest ideas are to use it to communicate with troops on the battle field.

the caveat here is that it is only unidirectional. it can only project voices. it cannot read them. this requires surgery and direct contact with the brain electrochemically (an implant).
the problem with the implant is firstly the battery and secondly the range.

so yes they can talk inside your skull to you but they cannot hear your thoughts.

davidivad wrote:yes it is true.
the original device worked with two different ultrasonic sounds. the difference between the two sounds is modified to be that of a voice in the audible range. while you cannot hear the ultrasonic sounds, you can hear that difference and thus a voice inside your skull. this has been out for over 50 years.

the latest implementation of it uses microwaves to do the same thing which is being done by the military. the latest ideas are to use it to communicate with troops on the battle field.

the caveat here is that it is only unidirectional. it can only project voices. it cannot read them. this requires surgery and direct contact with the brain electrochemically (an implant).
the problem with the implant is firstly the battery and secondly the range.

so yes they can talk inside your skull to you but they cannot hear your thoughts.

Thank you for the info, Im gathering all the information I could to prove this.

Davidivad, I have to say I don't think you are fully correct on this.
People who use voice to skull now can combine it with mind reading technology, it's called remote neural monitoring.
Normally I wouldn't be so arrogant on this issue, but this is what I go through personally on a daily basis. V2k combined with mind reading and comments or responses to my thoughts (via the same V2k).

Sure, there's always a possibility that it could be schizophrenia, but this is not what I think is going on here. Anyway, you guys can take what you want from this. It's just my opinion but you can find info on both technologies if you look online, though there are always going to be people who deny the existence of it and attribute it to schizophrenia.

-- Fri May 30, 2014 11:54 pm --

http://www.greatdreams.com/RNM.htm

twistednerve wrote:Hi.
I dont want to be rude, but clearly Cliff is schizophrenic it seems, and he doesnt want to deal with it this way.

The way he is writing indicates cognitive decline, he is paranoid, he is making up huge conspiracies and he is hearing voices.

Cliff, dude, go to a really good psychiatrist and see what you can do about it.

And even if so, if I may, that doesn't mean voice to skull technology isnt real. If such a technology exists (and I truly believe it does for reasons not related to psychiatry) by all means someone will figure out a way to exploit it.

frogs wrote:Davidivad, I have to say I don't think you are fully correct on this.
People who use voice to skull now can combine it with mind reading technology, it's called remote neural monitoring.
Normally I wouldn't be so arrogant on this issue, but this is what I go through personally on a daily basis. V2k combined with mind reading and comments or responses to my thoughts (via the same V2k).

Sure, there's always a possibility that it could be schizophrenia, but this is not what I think is going on here. Anyway, you guys can take what you want from this. It's just my opinion but you can find info on both technologies if you look online, though there are always going to be people who deny the existence of it and attribute it to schizophrenia.

-- Fri May 30, 2014 11:54 pm --

http://www.greatdreams.com/RNM.htm

i understand your need to explain the voices. it seems so real you have a hard time dismissing it as not real. for your benefit, may i suggest that the use of suggestion and response statistics may be used to give the illusion of mind reading. look up red hammer on youtube. the only thing you must come up with now is why.

this would be an expensive operation requiring a large group of people which needs funding and management. funding requires some sort of financial potential. it would be much cheaper and more effective to use data incurred by electronic devices (your meta data) and manipulate you through statistics. in the end, it is possible but wildly inefficient pound for pound compared to the tools corporations and government already use on us. it all boils down to numbers. even if there were some scheme to trick someone into assasinating someone, it would be more effective and cheaper to start a social movement.

frogs wrote:Davidivad, I have to say I don't think you are fully correct on this.
People who use voice to skull now can combine it with mind reading technology, it's called remote neural monitoring.
Normally I wouldn't be so arrogant on this issue, but this is what I go through personally on a daily basis. V2k combined with mind reading and comments or responses to my thoughts (via the same V2k).

Sure, there's always a possibility that it could be schizophrenia, but this is not what I think is going on here. Anyway, you guys can take what you want from this. It's just my opinion but you can find info on both technologies if you look online, though there are always going to be people who deny the existence of it and attribute it to schizophrenia.

-- Fri May 30, 2014 11:54 pm --

http://www.greatdreams.com/RNM.htm

TO read your mind they need to get a chip in their first which relies on body energy to function. Without chip all they can do is project things into you not read it.