Riccola wrote:I fully agree, especially when a large number of those un-habitual behaviors are iatrogenically created by the institutions themselves.
I read a few psychiatric records and they are written in the really disgusting patients deprecating style. Let's take that notorious theatricality for example. They record "theatrical behaviour". But that is just a style, just a narration, because one describing anther's actions can use other much more "honorable" set of words. A recorder can say something like "emotionally intense" or " emotional, inquisitive, playful behaviour" or instead of theatricality. And saying like this we have absolutely another picture. A patient becomes a hero, a role model, but the psychiatrists create deliberately negative narratives to justify their treatments!
Moreover, they would never write down something like "suffering" or "feeling emotional pain", or "having troubled mind" they would report "anxious" or something alike in a very special "dead" bureaucratically derogatory style, showing no compassion to their patients.
Writing this I wonder how the nirvana can be called in their language? A kind of senile debility or schizophrenia final stage?
By the way, T. Szasz said that they also diagnosed all Shakespeare's protagonists with different kinds of mental disorders.
They are sophisticated muckrakers finding crap, "illness" in their language, in every mind activity, defiling everything. There is also a question if the psychiatry can diagnose itself, but that is a separate complex story.
Riccola wrote:With psychiatry doing as it pleases, the US is far from a free nation.
In my perspective, there was a silent coup de etat in the US . The psychiatrist lobby gained incredible power in the recent ... 20, or 30 years it has never before in human history. They probably violated some laws and democracy.
The problem is that we don't know the exact plans of the psychiatrists lobby. Moreover they are the potential danger to the whole world, because they can use the US power in their own purposes.
This situation is not widely discussed in media (N. Chomsky speaks about everything but the psychiatry, for example), so the general public doesn't fully understand the gravity of the situation.