I'm Back!

I guess I have a real life and job, and that does not allow me to respond to every reply to my posts the day it is posted.

Your reponses to my post "This form does more harm than good", were what I would have expected. You ignored the pertinent comments regarding my experiences and where I was coming from, and dwelled entirely on my comments regarding the forum's reliance on superstitions as a form of "treatment". No comments on the way practitioners throw meds at patients with no regard to true medical practice of lab workups to acquire baselines of brain chemicals before undertaking a regimen of drugs. I am beginning to think my ex knew more than I, when preferring to self medicate with alcohol. Tom Cruise, as much as I think he is a wack job, might be onto to something with regard to psychological meds.

Placebo effect? So god and religion is now a pill, a drug? You just made my case. Karl Marx would give you a big fat wet kiss. You agree then that "religion is the opiate for the masses". How truly pathetic that anyone in medical science or any where else could be so hypocritical. But isn't that the method behind Alcoholics Anonymous and all the other pseudo scientific treatment methods for "addiction"? You get the person to trade one addiction for another? Religion and group co-dependency for their alcohol, drugs or sex?

As to censorship, you didn't just censor, the woman in question, you terminated the dialog. You obviously do not know the difference between censorship, and moderation of a forum.

I was actually curious about the psychology underlying someone's inclination to participate in bestiality and other sexual deviancies like BDSM. But obvioulsy this forum is not interested in providing answers but rather handing out placebos.