Sigm wrote:Consider the following exchanges between myself and a psychologist and tell me if it sounds like the psychologist acted appropriately or inappropriately:
Exchange 1.
Psychologist: You are depressed. You need medications
Me: I don't want medications.
Psychologist: You need medications
Me: I don't want medications.
Psychologist: Medications will make you more intelligent.
Me: That's not true.
Psychologist: Medications will make you more intelligent.
Exchange 2.
Me: Now that you are done evaluating, can I have therapy?
Psychologist: No, because when a person is so depressed there is nothing you can tell them that will make them feel better because they won't listen. You need to see a psychiatrist who will give you medications.
Exchange 3.
Psychologist: Do you drink or smoke?
Me: No
Psychologist: <doesn't say anything>
Me: <I stare at the psychologist, uncomfortably>
Psychologist: <stares at the me>
Me: <don't say anything>
Psychologist: Ok...
This fascinates me. I love tearing apart people's psych's when they leave them so vacantly open.
That said, let me explain what this Psychologist is thinking/feeling.
Psychologist: You are depressed. You need medications
Me: I don't want medications.
Psychologist: You need medications
Me: I don't want medications.
Psychologist: Medications will make you more intelligent.
Me: That's not true.
Psychologist: Medications will make you more intelligent.
Line 1: Psychologist: You are suffering a disorder. The only way I can see help for you is medications. (Note: this is further explained and sensible based on the other things he shows to think.)
Line 3: Psychologist: No, I am right. You are suffering a disorder. I am right and you do need medications to fix yourself.
Line 5: Psychologist: I am right, you are too naive to understand my intelligence. Therefore, I am not going to try to deceive you using 'sly' methods.
Line 7: Psychologist: (This is an interesting line. I've noticed that all your exchanges end with the Psychologist having the last word...) I insist, for I am not incorrect what-so-ever. Thus, you need to do what I say.
Exchange 2.
Me: Now that you are done evaluating, can I have therapy?
Psychologist: No, because when a person is so depressed there is nothing you can tell them that will make them feel better because they won't listen. You need to see a psychiatrist who will give you medications.
This is after exchange 1, I am assuming. If not, what I am about to say could be and likely is dead wrong.
Line 2: Psychologist: I am incompetent in treating my patients' mental needs. I view them as physical objects just as a medical doctor should. (This is his way of deceiving himself into thinking he is not incompetent.) You are not going to be treated by me because you will not comply to the standards which satisfy my competency validation. You will cause me to be incompetent
because you are not doing what I want. ( The underlined part is a rationalization of his failings as a psychologist.)
Exchange 3.
Psychologist: Do you drink or smoke?
Me: No
Psychologist: <doesn't say anything>
Me: <I stare at the psychologist, uncomfortably>
Psychologist: <stares at the me>
Me: <don't say anything>
Psychologist: Ok...
I'm not getting much from this.
It seems like he was assuming you did one of those two things and when you proved him wrong, he was uncomfortable. He inflicted his uncomfortableness onto you by not speaking. However, he established his comfortableness by putting you in a position where you thought you were the one that was uncomfortable and weird.