Latitudinarian wrote: 1. Because psychiatrists frequently cause harm, permanent disabilities, death - death of the body-mind-spirit.
Bold claim, where are the numbers to back it up?
2. Because psychiatrists frequently violate the Hippocratic Oath which orders all physicians "First Do No Harm."
Again, frequently is a vagary that shouldn't be there if we are attempting to discard an establishment as entrenched in society as this.
3. Because psychiatrists patronize and disempower people, especially their patients.
That's a generalization, that should not be applied to all psychiatrists, and could easily be fixed by reforming psychiatry rather than abolishing it.
4. Because psychiatry is not a medical science.
In that case what do you mean by medical science? Making a claim that something is not a medical science is best followed by reasons why it isn't.
5. Because psychiatry is quackery, a pseudo-science which lacks independent diagnostic tests, testable hypotheses, and cures for "schizophrenia" and all other types of alleged "mental illness" or "mental disorder".
Actually, that's not the case with
psychiatry in which a study of brain chemistry is significant. I also wonder, am I supposed to accept the concept of spirit-death as medical science?
6. Because psychiatrists can not accurately and reliably predict dangerousness, violence, or any other type of human behaviour, yet make such claims as "expert witnesses", and with the media promote the "dangerous mental patient" myth/stereotype.
So, because they are not psychic, we must discard any theories or analysis that might be useful? Their predictions are actually reliable, not infallible, however the two are not one and the same.
7. Because psychiatrists have caused a worldwide epidemic of brain damage by promoting and prescribing brain-disabling treatments such as the neuroleptics, antidepressants, electroconvulsive brainwashing (electroshock), and psychosurgery (lobotomy).
In order for it to be an epidemic, it needs to be infectious, or contagious in some way.
8. Because psychiatrists manufacture hundreds of "mental disorders" classified in its bible called "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" (a modern witch-hunting manual); such "mental disorders" and "symptoms" are in fact negative, class-and-culturally-biased moral judgments for dissident ways of coping with personal problems and alternative ways of perceiving, interpreting or being in the world.
It's not a bible. It establishes, within itself, that there are cultural issues to consider, and that it is
merely a means to communicate to each other on similar conditions.
Also, so far, we've hit at least 3 value judgements, and biased statements. Lat: Where is the objectivity you value?
I'll skip ahead to a stunning attempt at propaganda:
21. Because psychiatrists masterminded the mass murder of hundreds of thousands of vulnerable people including disabled children, the elderly and psychiatric patients during The Holocaust in Nazi Germany, and "selected" hundreds of thousands of concentration camp prisoners for death ("T-4 euthanasia" program) - historical facts still missing in psychiatric textbooks and histories.
A lot of different people, in varied professions had a hand in deaths in WWII. Should we abolish all medicine because of the famed Doctor Death?
Anyway, this article is the most dogmatic, reactionary, biased, and all around poor argument for the anti-psychiatry movement. It does the opposite of what it claims it wishes to do. One could almost suspect it of being an argument for psychiatry, by making the anti-psychiatry movement look even more "out there" than Freud.