Funny, you say you dislike all people, yet here you are. And where would your like for photography be without the trials and accomplishments of other people who developed such technology?
Please hear me out.
I'm not trying to reform you. I'm not saying, "Hey look, you love people!". No. I believe you really have no strong affection for the comanionship of other people. It's all a matter of degrees. Many people hate riding the bus and touching the bodies of strangers. Other people hug and kiss strangers. Degrees.
I fully understand the theater of forced hospitalization. I have been in in just such a situation. And only once. I've learned to avoid it. I would hope that all others could. Treatment? Fine. Forced treatment? Pretty useless. In my opinion. There are always exceptions.
I am not a proponent of long-term medication. (For everyone who is excepting to this, I respect your view.) If a person has been under many and varying psychoactive medications, especially for a long duration, then the cessation of those medication will very often lead to an emergence of undesirable emotional and cognitive symptoms.
In laymens turn: if someone takes psych meds for years and stops, s/he will "go crazy". Sometimes, it's a recurrance of latent symptoms, but it can also be withdrawal. A person's body has to overcome the change in chemistry. If someone's brain hasn't been making it's own chems for years (because s/he has been injesting them) it can't suddenly start making them. The brain is out of shape like an atrophied muscle.
I'm not saying such individuals are to blame, nor are they lazy. Just as someone with a spinal cord injury may need to undergo rehabilitation, so too is the recovery from mental illness. Did you know there are people who were wheelchair bound for years and regained muscle control through rigorous exercise?
People can and do recover from mental illness. It doesn't mean you might never get sick, but it can mean you will sometimes be well.
It's hard not to be offensive (preventative defence) when one has grown accustomed to stigmatization. It's like learned helplessness, but it's learned defensiveness.
I would urge you to try and retain defence for actual attacks. This is an area of my own life I still struggle with. If I am offensive before an attack has begun, then an attack will surely arrise. But if I exercise patience, keeping defense in reserve, I find greater opportunity to understand others and have them understand me. Doesn't always work, but I try. And if I need to be defensive then I can be so. I just prefer to avoid the fight altogether.
It is a misconception that mental illness equates to violence. Therefore we have an additional struggle to overcome that stereotype and not use violent words except when necessary.
There's more than one way to introduce someone to thier character flaws. As, you discovered, calling for a lawyer can be more effective than calling out "b!tch". Either way you're calling the person a liar and a criminal.
As for degrees of affection. Yes, love can be attributed to firing of electrical impulses and to chemical reactions. So can depression and anxiety. We have injestible forms (foods and meds) of those chemicals. We can synthetically induce anxiety, love, anger, compassion. And we can tell the difference between the synthetic emotion and the real one. When we cannot, we have lost control over these responces.
Science is so infantile regarding the study of emotions and behavioral responces. "Scientific" evidence is used to argue the chemical basis for forced medications, but not for forced obesity treatment-not for forced marital counseling. What if spouses could force their partners to take exctasy? Further, "scientific" evidence is used on both sides of any controversial issue--abortion, homosexuality, climatic variation, whatever.
Regardless of cause, an individual's ability to feel love is as valid as one's ability to feel distain.
If you ... don't like these things people call love, don't want to be around people, you will not fit in very well in society.
Well, yes. That's the very definition of a human society--a group of people.
Many , though, are isolationist. But how would you ever know? You aren't going to find conventions of isolationists. The culture of isolation is not one to host parades, is it?
So much of cultural conflict gets labeled as mental illness, it disturbs me. Some cultures think Americans are all a bit loony because they are so personal at work. Other cultures think our chummy smiling laughing attitudes are a sign of a weak-minded culture. Some cultures have grand displays of emotion at funerals and some are somber.
When we automatically label those whose personalities that differ from us as ill, we have failed to even attempt to understand the other person. Maybe they are ill, but one still needs some basis of understanding in order to facilitate healing. And why wouldn't we want each other to be well? Why would we want others to be sick and down-trodden? Either we are systemically blind to the impact of our actions or we are deliberately benefitting from the ill-welfare of others.
When we act so poorly, we are gross creatures. But we can be cleaner. We can wash ourselves of prejudices. We can facilitate each others healing.
[qoute]I have realized through trial and error that what normal people term loneliness is quite liberating for me[/quote]
Returning to this point. Again I suggest the book "Party of One: A Loner's Manifesto." The author details the healthy benefits of isolation. She questions how psychiatry would operate if the inability to self-soothe, to self-entertain, were considered abnormal and the ability to seperate oneself from others as healthy. She also does not deamonize those who thrive in larger social groups. She is a loner with a healhty respect for non-loners.
To me, people are manipulative, dirty creatures to be avoided--both men and women. I do understand though that they feel things and I do have empathy for people just like I do animals.
That is not an empathetic statment. It is one of sympathy. Empathy means you
feel just like the other does. Sympathy means you
feel for the other.
If you feel like you are a dirty creature then you are empathetic only if the other person aslo feels that way. If you feel sorry for someone, but don't share their experience you are only sympathetic.
I am not making a judgment of empathy vs. sympathy. I am only noting the difference linguistically between the two words.
The difference, also, is that when we feel empathy we are more likely to act to resolve another person's suffering than if we feel only sympathy.
Psychiatrists who think themselves to have never been ill mentally do not have empathy no matter the degree of sympathy they may have. They act to allieviate suffering, but without empathy the actions are less on target.
The women ...think men just want them for sex....Men I dont trust at all as I think most will try to molest you if given the chance.
I'm sorry that your experience with people has been so negative. I assure you that such people are not totality of the species. Some people are asexual. They have no innate desire for sexual contact of any kind. Most other people have healthy boundaries regarding sexual displays and encounters. Those that don't or are deviant from the norm, just stick out. Right?
Things that are different stick out unless they are camoflauged.
If I could say anything to people, this would be it. You dont have to run from me. I am just doing what I can to surivve.
Defense and camoflauge. Everything does it to survive. If you remove yourself from dangerous situations you will find the fight for survival less threatening.
Like I said earlier. You aren't going to find conventions of isolationists. You won't find asexual people hunting bars for one-night stands. (Maybe, who knows.)
If you want to feel less alone in your choice of aloneness, you'll have to really hunt for those people. Cause just like you, they hide.
If you just want to be alone, then just be alone. You don't have to be atacked by others if you don't engage with them. Yeah, you might "have" to hold down a job or grocery shoip, whatever. Accept that co-workers might think you are cold. What do you care what they think? So what if the cashier thinks you are rude for not saying hi back?
Maybe, too, you can learn to camoflauge yourself with the trappings of your culture. Is it so painful to say "Fine, and you?"
And as for "having" to interact with others. Well, what is stopping any of us from running off and being hermits in the woods?
There are religious enclaves open to hermetic lifestyles. There is still wilderness one can purchase and homestead on. One could caravan/RV the landscape. Whatever.
As for philosophy and the"after-life." You are more than free to your own opinions on the matter. We all are. Do not let the beliefs of others make you defensive of yours. Whether people look forward to heaven, nirvana, or oblivion, they all look forward to a cessation of suffering.
I believe mankind lives in angst and all of his actions are simply reflections of this. People invent the idea of god, relationships, and love simply because that is what they have found to cope with the angst.
Your beliefs are little different from the fundamentals of many philosophies and religions. That is that we are all suffering and are bound to the things we create to allieviate our suffering.
It is good for the survivial of humanity that people like me are not part of it. ... If I were to choose to be a part of the pool, I would taint it. My defective genes do not in any way belong in the pool.
I reserve the right to a differing opinion. Altruism and selfishness are equally essential to the survival of a species. Community and isolation are also equally important. If hiding is the necessary skill ofr surviving some calamity, then social butterflies would be hard presessed to survive.
In fact, if there was a govenrment eugenics program for euthanization, I would readily volunteer. I am not currenly suicidial but certainly would give serious consideration to this program, if it did exist.
Those words do not reinforce your previous that your tempermant should be accepted by others. You ask for others not to call you names, yet you claim yourself as useful only in death? Well, how does that engender respect from others?
Moss
"If you're here, it's difficult. That is the first nobel truth."
"Be the change you want to see in the world."
[/i][/quote]