greatest disappointments and the feeding mechanisms of psych

Hello, I'll begin.

My greatest disappointment as a child is recognising and being taught to recognise the failures in these systems.

There isn't any therapy in the institution, I was labelled therapy resistant despite taking my medication without question and despite no real or even fake attempts at therapy occuring.

I've spent time in several hospitals, in Lismore NSW I was threatened with something being inserted into my rectum if my pants were not pulled up, that's a big thing, to allow that to occur is ridiculous and I was discharged while on a treatment order meaning they just set off a big red flag, kicking someone out while they are on a CTO, which unless the practice or facility's staff have committed a criminal act against the patient wouldn't occur.

I've never been asked for my history, never been tested in any way shape or form, barely been observed and honestly you will find that the reason for being treatment resistant would stem from mistrust of the profession, of course being the pathetic weasel your average mental health professional is they will not down like a child as a reason you failed as "not trusting my profession".

Their profession has failed time and time again to prove anything outside a system that someone heavily disabled could navigate and receive accolades for e.g the results they produce e.g depression equals depression and yay they get a gold star.....from themselves........and lucky you get to be their victim.

They are the equivalent of a heavily intellectually disabled person arguing with itself while being unable to agree with itself while congratulations are given all round for making the argument it couldn't prove in the first place, of course and thanks to oversensitive people we are expected to congratulate this being on having a premise it failed to prove.

The you tried awards is what most psychs get and of course if it opens the door for you it expects a pat on the back as if it's changed your world, as if it's a door you've never opened and something you couldn't do, it speaks volumes of the "ego" that's for sure, more speaks to what society has been conditioned to accept as proof by them and their enablers, e.g government, university etc.

It's all for resources whether they be tangible physically or not.

It's all for gain.

Given the rate of misdiagnosis is over 50% I take nothing they say seriously, especially given their personality as a whole and the significant chance you will have this information used in an attack against your person.

I mean I've been sectioned for sitting outside thinking out loud to myself, literally, granted it was early in the morning, the idiot that reported me couldn't have heard a word I was saying based on the proximity and thickness of walls in-between us let alone understand why I was saying it.

Obviously forgetting that his across the hall neighbour threatened extreme violence against me the day I arrived because he is a self indulgent closet alcoholic with a victim complex.

I even made a video and sent it to the real estate, they did nothing, but what do you expect from low class low minded knuckle draggers, the amount of daddy issues in that place was palpable to the point of taste.

Anyway I pointed out that evidence is required to section someone and the police disagreed saying they needed none, one shot of a useless drug cocktail and off I go for a six week ride to a facility where you see the doctor for 5 minutes once every few days and miraculously they know you.

Do these doctors think you can diagnose people on sight?

I'd be interested in starting a game.

Get the diagnosis wrong the first time and lose your job, it would be a terrific game.

Their attempts to use projection and transference in an offensive setting would be hampered, it's like watching a rat corner itself and begin making an argument before a threat presents itself, it builds it's defense or attack in its mind and off it goes, the problem you have is the rat will never admit it's wrong, it's not capable of doing it, it's not mature enough.

It just keeps using the same flawed and destitute methodology it always has to justify its own existence.

There is a Latin term for something that exists only to prove itself and that is what the social sciences are to me, it would be willing to control the populace so it still has use and form.

It's a pity.

It's soul crushing to see.