Certainly any organization claiming to be for the rights of patients diagnosed mentally ill would have as their primary goal, full informed consent in the field of mental health – including full and complete disclosure of all drug risks, the right to refuse treatment, the right to know that psychiatric diagnoses are not medical conditions (evident by the fact there is not one confirmatory medical/scientific test). Above all such groups would provide patients with an abundance of information on non-harmful, non- drug, medical solutions and options considering the dangerous and well documented risks of psychiatric drugs by international drug regulatory agencies.
NAMI does not.
Here is the CCHR report on NAMI http://www.cchrint.org/issues/psycho-pharmaceutical-front-groups/
So I was posting various truths about psychiatry and now the NAMI website appears to be "broken" the pages take forever to load or don't load at all ect.
Am I supposed to believe that those millions of pharma dollars can't hire someone to get the website to work properly and they just let there #1 propaganda tool malfunction ?
I haven't tried from a different computer but that website "Soberrecovery" did the same thing when I was posting the truth about psychiatry without violating the terms of service. Instead of banning me they did some little trick of putting a special long timeout to make it seem like it was my WIFI or a website problem but when I used my friends computer down the street it loaded up just fine. Other web pages loaded fine and speedtest.net confirmed my WIFI was not slow.
Anyway if anyone is doing any online activism against the fraud of psychiatry today don't forget to spread the word about NAMI being a pharma front that fights against the rights of people accused of mental illness, advocates forced drugging and pushes drugs on children for the benefit of its pharma paymasters.
This website has alot of good links for posting about NAMI http://namiexposed.com/
One thing I am surprised about is as far as I can tell the NAMI website has not resorted to censorship in the discussion groups but the comments section on home page stories is of course "moderated" to make it appear that other posters all agree and if the reader doesn't they are a minority.
