Can anything be done to punish a psychiatrist?

1. a psychiatrist wrote false information about me into reports and in particular he wrote that I believe X, but I do not and he also tricked me to talk about my family and wrote a report where he omitted everything good, positive, or normal that I said and he fabricated an extremely negative, pessimistic, crazy report. In places he has many things added that I did not say, and those things make it much more negative, and convincing.

2. he used this report full of untruths to recommend an involuntary commitment. There was no reason for it, and no justification, only the extremely negative report that he made. I objected against the false information in the report, but he did not care, and nobody else cared either. When I appealed the involuntary commitment the report was used against me as an evidence of a disorder which I do not have, and I was not allowed to talk, only a solicitor could talk, and he did not even challenge things. I was started without a good reason on an apathy-causing, brain-disrupting drug, and when I wanted to complain I got the dose increased for it, so then I could not think well-enough to put a complaint letter together.

3. Now it has been a few months since I am out from that hell. I had to leave the country to avoid the harmful mistreatment with drugs, and a) for the time in the hospital I did not have any condition b) for the time I am out I do not have any condition c) whenever the crazy quack disagreed with me he insulted me by saying that I am delusional, and he wrote / said slander such as "he is very delusional" to others, without even explaining why he is saying it (because we had a disagreement, and the mofo wanted to have everything his way)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unimportant details:
The solicitor has not done anything for me. He let the quack use this report against me, and that is why I spent two months in the psych ward in extreme discomfort locked up without being dangerous, and the harmful toxic drug mistreatment was against my will, they said I am locked up because a) they think I would not take the drug outside [without any evidence that would suggest so] b) it is [according to them] good for my health.

The biggest reason exploited to keep me locked up was that it is supposedly good for my health, and that my health would otherwise deteriorate. (how do they know it? what evidence is there my health is not OK in the first place? what evidence is there my health would worsen? what evidence is there for anything they said? None. It is only their "opinion", and I was told their opinion is taken as the absolute truth and if I disagree with their opinion I cannot do anything.]

When I argued that my health is good and is deteriorating only if I am locked up, they said I lack insight [when in reality they lack insight]. And everything they had against me was their report made on the spot, and other similar reports fabricated by the quacks after the first one. They knowingly wrote false information, different from what I said, lied by omission, lied by adding things I did not say, lied by misinterpreting every sentence into extremely negative statements, or straight ridiculous.

Because the solicitor did not challenge any of it, I have lost the appeal to be released, and spent two months locked up without reason, given a diagnosis which I disagree with because I do not have any fixed false belief, I only had a false belief which was not fixed and I have changed that belief very soon. But the quacks exploited everything to put that false label on me, coerced me to take the harmful drug, caused damage to me, and I do not know how to put this right. Their opinion is a BS, and the opinion of all others who were meant to be independent and objective was based on reading those reports. There was nothing truthful, they even got my date of birth wrong, it was a 100% deception. Every question from the quack was a calculated action, a trickery, and he just wrote what he wanted to confirm the diagnosis that he wanted. There was nothing in what I said that would confirm that diagnosis, and it was very much disproving it. He skipped that, made the case fit the diagnosis, and for a normal, non-fixed belief [which nobody ever proved as false], he decided to write delusional disorder, and made up sh*t in the report to support it. There was absolutely nothing I said that would support that diagnosis. The mofo changed everything I said to fit for the report.

The appeal process was for him to prove I am not OK, and he used that report to convince everybody. I just want to figure out how to punish him for something like fraud, malpractice, harmful and irresponsible drug treatment, falsifying medical documentation, knowingly and with intent deceiving and misrepresenting me by changing things I said from the past tense into present, so he was never describing my current health [because he would have to release me], and always asked about one past incident [I made a crime report in the past and he asked about it], and he put stuff from it as if I believed it now when I did not, he ignored my reasoning that the crime report has been misinterpreted at the station, and that those are not my beliefs, he copied all misinterpretation written by somebody else from that report, and added more extremely negative stuff about me which I did not in reality say, or think in any way.

Staff said I cannot argue with his opinion, and that medical report is his opinion. Or something like that. So the snake can write whatever he wants. He also wants to withhold the most negative stuff he wrote about me. When he withholds it from me, it means he will not give me a copy via the information act, and I will not be able to challenge some of the most negative fabricated information. His argument is that it would be dangerous for my health to show me, or something like that. In reality he is protecting himself from getting exposed for falsifying negative stuff about me.

In any other profession he could get fired, inspected, fined, or successfully sued, what can be done against this psychiatrist and his friends, staff who were there with him while he was falsifying this? What can be done against the solicitor who did not challenge the false information in the reports and made me lose the appeal? Is there any chance to successfully punish them and correct things when I have a false diagnosis and 2 months of health damaging harmful drug mistreatment while unreasonably locked up [because it is good for my health, he said]?

Sometimes it's best to just quit and walk off the battlefield.

But you can write reviews and use consumer complaint sites so when people search the name of the hospital or doctor your complaint comes up in the search results for the world to see.

Here are three popular consumer complaint sites,

http://www.ripoffreport.com

http://www.scambook.com

http://www.pissedconsumer.com

Exposing psychiatry's crimes by posting them online sounds like a punishment to me.

If you or anyone else are going to do this do not write these complaints when angry or write anything stupid because there is no go back and edit or delete button after you post it.

-- Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:41 am --

What is funny is that after the first person writes a complaint other people see it and start posting there own complaints now that you have made a place for them to write.

I agree with Copy_Cat. Activism and raising awareness are the best option. Their are those who have done great injustice, unfortunately the system protects them. Getting people to acknowledge that is key.

So you pissed off a petty tyrant. Big deal.
You are still alive, which is what is really important.

And they got your date of birth wrong,
so you can prove the diagnosis was of somebody else with the same name.

Maybe you pissed them off by being combative ?