Quackery - false diagnosis, coerction, brain-damaging drugs

I have a problem with a psych-sociopath (psychopath / sociopath) who abused me for many years. He is in my family. I left and moved to a different country, and everything was OK for years until I called someone else in the family and announced that I am finishing my Master's thesis and that this will help me get to America where I want for so many years. I then started having issues and have been a victim of repeated assaults by the psych-sociopath.

He came with some big guy into my flat, assaulted me, and misinformed me that the big guy is the MI5 and that I am now a human subject in his experiment. Then they pushed some instrument in the roof of my eye sockets and the psych-sociopath was telling me he is removing my degree, and that he wants to see how I will write anything now. (Hate against my thesis).

They threatened to make me homeless, said that nobody will believe me they were there, bragged nobody has seen them except me, and again lied I am in an experiment, supposedly with "erasing memory", and that they will see how it is working on me. The psych-sociopath is suffering from an untreated bipolar and has been always very aggressive. In his outbursts of anger he told me when I will be homeless I should call him for help or I will be stripped of all rights, and go to a psych ward. He also threatened I will stay there for the rest of my life if I talk about what they did to me.

I went to a general practitioner to have an MRI as an evidence against them. The GP did not believe me that I was assaulted with an instrument. She said she cannot see a scar. I argued that I need the MRI because I have all symptoms of a brain injury and that I want to see whether the injury is visible or not. I said I need an MRI as an evidence of the injury. It does not work vice-versa, I cannot show evidence of the injury to the GP, I need evidence of the injury from the GP.

I could finally remember how it happened, so when the GP argued I told her in short about the trespassing, assault, and threats. I showed her my crime report card. She still refused to believe me. I explained the ice-pick procedure done by Walter Freeman and that the prefrontal one does not leave any scar. I said what happened to me was very similar, and that it is exactly the same spot in the procedure which the perpetrators exploited.

The general practitioner refused to do any MRI, X-ray, or any other biological test regardless of what I was saying. I got falsely labeled with psychosis despite of already having a crime report about the incident and the GP still did not care. I only wanted to see whether I can get some evidence to back up the crime report with an MRI or something. I said I will complain because I do not have any psychosis. She said she is writing psychosis into my medical record anyway. I disagreed, and argued that I am perfectly reasonable and realistic, and want a test to make sure everything is OK because I have symptoms of an injury. She ignored everything I was saying, including any symptoms that I named. She even ignored the described memory loss which I never had before. I could not remember my favorite movies, music, books I have read, and it was very clear to me that something happened because I had that weakness in my body, and that if it was psychosis I would not have any amnesia.

The amnesia was gradually improving. I found on medical websites an amnesia can be caused by brain damage. This is what I found also later in other sources, that damage to neurons causes some memory loss, and it is also how the ice-pick procedure by Freeman works.

After the GP wrote psychosis and ignored my objections, I complained to the manager, was told to put it in writing, really made a written complain, had no answer, and have been ignored. Meanwhile the police investigator called the GP, then called me and said he heard [from my GP] that I have mental issues and that he is closing the case. There was zero investigation, nobody checked for their description, no check of the cameras, neighbors, nothing was done except for falsely accusing me of mental health BS.

I moved to a different address, everything seemed good again, but once I updated my address everywhere on the Internet, I was again assaulted by the big guy who again managed to get into my flat. He did the same assault as before, but this time he got in through the door. Nobody in the flat was locking the door. It was just shut. He threatened to make me homeless, unemployed, facilitate stress for me, and that I must immediately stop studying at my university or he will continue. He said if I complain about the blackmail, assault, and trespassing that I will get locked up myself. Then he was again saying crazy things to confuse me, i.e. that I am in an experiment, and that he is the MI5, he forced me under death threats to sign some document for him. He had it printed in there (some nonsense about agreeing to be a human subject in an experiment with "erasing memory")

The psych-sociopath from my family was on the phone during the second assault instead of coming in person, and every sentence he said was something extremely spiteful, aggressive, and full of hate.

I complained to the police that they did not believe me and because of that I got assaulted again. They twisted every sentence into some mumbo-jumbo at the police station because they stopped thinking exactly at the moment I said he assaulted me with an instrument which he cut into my head and caused memory loss. I educated them about the ice-pick procedure invented by Freeman, and they did not believe me anyway, never heard of it, lied I have to wait for an investigator to be assigned, and behind my back referred me to social services and mental health BS.

What happened next was that I tried to get someone from the police to investigate because I really painfully needed to secure some evidence against them, however the police kept saying I must wait for the investigator to call me. Nobody called. When I made a complaint it got closed without telling me the reason. When I went to the police station I was told to call the police number instead. When I called the number I was told they will not talk to me about that, and that I must come to the police station instead. The number wanted my address, then sent a social services annoying dummy to my address, and he came exactly the moment I was moving out, and was a pain in the back.

I had repeated letters inviting me to come to the mental health BS assessment, and repeated annoying calls from the social worker annoying dummies. All of them were referred by the police while the police just kept telling me every time to wait for an investigator. They always had some excuse, and I had to tell the excuse to the other police to find that the first police were wrong. When I came back to the first police they made another excuse. This was going on whole year. I was never honestly informed about what the police actually wrote into the crime report which I made at the station, and I was never informed about what they are doing instead of getting someone on the case. Had I known they are only setting up social workers and mental health quacks against me, I would never come to their station again.

The incident culminated when the social workers contacted my university, obviously behind my back, and plotted against me with the university's well-being person who deceived me that he will offer support with accommodation and instead was collecting things against me (anything about the incident) from my personal emails sent from my university email account to the security. He eventually succeeded getting one or two emails that were mine, and he forwarded them to the mental health quacks.

Then he again deceived me to come for a support meeting, and instead of any support he called 3 quacks from mental health to come and assess me at the university. They came with 3 police officers, and had everything already decided from the police crime report which the police forwarded them, again without my consent and behind my back. The quacks told me they think I cannot make good decisions for myself [which was absolutely nothing else than a dirty lie of these crazy quacks], and they said I am getting detained for assessment [involuntary commitment for up to a month].

I was taken away in handcuffs from the university where until their arrival I never did anything that would be posing danger to myself or others. I was never aggressive to anyone, I studied properly, I was at the university every day and worked on my research, there was absolutely no reason to be coerced by quacks into involuntary commitment lasting a month.

In the psychiatric ward I was abused by a quack to take a brain-damaging drug which has done more damage to my mind, body, and brain than all possible issues from my entire life combined, and the drug was damaging my nervous system, caused uncontrollable trembling, extreme depressions, suicidability, zero pleasure from anything, excessive weight-gain, loss of intellectual capacity, loss of dynamics of emotions (I was numb), sexual dysfunction, parkinsonism, stiff muscles, shortness of breath and related major anxiety, tiredness throughout all day, something was wrong with my heart (I have a heart condition and I felt how much serious it got when the drug was in my body), and every time I was not lying on my back in the bad I was just feeling like I am passing out, I had pressure in my head and saw black (perhaps the heart issue).

The quacks only asked me why I am there. I told them it is for making a crime report. Not for any actual behavior. They find out I indeed never behaved in an aggressive way, was never dangerous to anyone, was never diagnosed with mental health disorders, and neither me nor anyone else in the family had any history of mental health illness. Regardless of that, the quacks asked me what was in the crime report, and when I told them somebody was in my flat and assaulted me, blackmailed me to stop studying, threatened to make me homeless, etc. they asked me for evidence, and then said when I have no evidence that I am delusional.

I argued delusions are when you have some evidence to prove that facts are different than what I say, and that you have no evidence, and you did not see what happened. I also argued delusions are when you still keep believing something after you have been given evidence that things are to the contrary. And most importantly, that delusions are impairment of perception, but my perception is normal, and accurate because if it were not I would be complaining also about other things, but all I am saying is this one issue which I cannot prove, but you cannot disprove because none of us has evidence to support or refute it.

The quacks said all that matters is their opinion. And that their opinion is I am unwell, severely mentally ill, I will have no leave, I will not go home in the next 2 days, I will be kept in psychiatric ward for monitoring. Every once in a while there was a quack looking at me through the window in the door, and knocking the door. When I looked the quack said "just checking!". It was very annoying. OK, I will not describe all the experience, only summarize that I was in a ward with severely brain damaged people who had saliva dropping from their mouth, uncontrollable laughing, uncontrollable shaking, they were tripping, instead of talk only mumbled, every instance of aggression was because they did not want to be there or did not want to be with the more severely brain damaged people, and it was blatantly obvious that those symptoms of brain damage caused by the psychiatric brain-damaging drugs were much more serious than any so-called mental illness in the world.

People were jailed just to take involuntarily drugs. I was abused, coerced, and threatened if I do not take the brain damaging drug I will be injected with even more damaging drug which has more side-effects. They are not side-effects of the drugs, they are EFFECTS.

Psychiatry is absolutely, deadly wrong. They damaged the brain by tearing it apart using electrodes (electroconvulsive therapy), they damaged the brain by cutting it thoroughly with an ice-pick stabbed inside through the eye sockets and wiggled while it is in to cause a big damage, now they damage the brain with toxic drugs that are known as chemical lobotomy.

In every single case the brain damage is dulling, and the person then does not show normal emotions. According to quacks what passes as normal is only a numb, flattened human being. That is the goal of psychiatrists. Make you brain damaged so much that you will stay permanently dull, numb, and flat. Then you are harmless to the society, and this is what they are here for.

However, when you were not dangerous in the first place, why are they doing the lobotomy to you? I had only people at the university who were concerned about my health because they did not believe me the assault, and they believe quacks are somehow helping people or curing people.

Ask quacks what did they ever cure? You will find out they cure nothing. They only do a brain damage, and it does not matter if your brain damage is done by electrodes, ice-pick, or toxic chemicals. Once you get a diagnosis, you will get an involuntary brain damage to numb you, dull you, and make sure you are no longer risk for the public.

Even if your problem is that you are slightly disruptive (like ADHD in kids), disruptivity of kids will be punished by brain damage done already in childhood to numb you.

I ask who are these effing quacks to damage people's brains, command involuntary commitment, and coerce into brain-damaging techniques whether you agree or not. How is it possible that "opinion" of someone who sees you while you have having life difficulties is enough to have a government-approved damage of your brain until you stay permanently changed, numb, dull, isolated from all friends and others because of your change of personality, etc.

Every diagnosis made by quacks is a final order of brain damage, using all coercion available, including jailing in a psychiatric ward. Everybody who ends up in their hands is a victim, they have nothing to do with medicine, health, well-being, or treatment. They call forced brain-damage a treatment, how come?

I have a forced brain damage command for complaining about a real assault which happened to me. I have it because in quack's opinion it did not happen to me. The quack has not seen it, was not in my flat when it happened, has no evidence that I am lying or wrong, and has no evidence to prove that he is not lying or that he is right. And yet he has issued the command to enforce a brain damage on me while bull**tting everybody including me that it is good for my health, and that my health would otherwise deteriorate if I did not get this brain damage done by his drugs. He was deceiving the commission where I complained by fabricating the most negative report possible. He skipped all the good things that I said, and compiled an extremely negative pile of mess from hearsay, copied [intentionally] misinterpretations from the police station, exaggerated what I said to make it absurd in the report, used fields that ask about my current health to instead write there disgusting things about cutting into the brain, etc. The quack has done everything to falsify that I am some serious case which is getting distressed by a serious problem of percepting incorrectly. None of it is true.

I am calm, professional, have a full-time job, obviously I stopped taking the brain damaging drug as soon as nobody was watching, I had to leave the country because of the quack since he wanted to put me on the list to get terrorized by quacks and social services who would force me to take the drug and talk to them. In the different country I do not have any quacks or any commanded brain damage, and nobody has assaulted me here (I hope they would catch the mofo in the act finally), and the false diagnosis is an obstacle in obtaining a USA visa. I feel like I cannot ever succeed with my dream to relocate there now because when I apply for an F1 to study another Master's, this time in the US, they ask about a mental disorder and if I was ever denied they ask for the form which was issued during the denial.

I tried escaping to the US to see a lawyer and tell him about the assault a long time before I was coerced by quacks, and in the US the CBP did not let me enter because they thought I have an intent to immigrate (only because I wanted to visit a lawyer during my holidays and ask him about the problem). Before returning me back they took a sworn statement, asked me about the problem, now it is in the form that I was tortured by people who broke my eye sockets and cut me in the head, and there are formulations that I did not say, but the customs and border protection officer wrote it because he thought some of these things, and obviously I disagree with the content of the form now, and I cannot tell anyone in the world what happened, only anonymously, because nobody believes that two criminals (one of whom I know) inspired themselves by Walter Freeman and assaulted me in my flat.

So I take it as an absolutely rare case which nobody will believe unless I get attacked again and will have it on my own camera (because the police did nothing, street cameras have never been checked). The psych-sociopath has caused me an enormous damage. I was in a psych ward for two months saying that I disagree with everything in those crime reports already from day one, but they just did not let me go, and coerced me to stay and have the chemical lobotomy. I only got out when I started answering their trick questions by telling them it is a nonsense, and that I do not want to talk about it because I do not believe it, how bad it was to even think about such things, etc.

Also note that to qualify as a mental disorder, you must have some diagnosable condition, but also some pattern of behavior related to that condition. If you do not have the behavior, and you are not dangerous, you are not complaining about any condition, you are productive, studying, working, etc. I do not see any reason to warrant why I was locked up for 2 months.

The whole case which I have is "You are saying X. I do not believe X. You are delusional and that is a serious disorder. We have issued your command of coercion into a forced brain damage. We will start with chemical brain damage. You will be coerced to take this drug. If you keep refusing it you will be injected with a drug which has even more side-effects. You cannot refuse, the choice is ours, you are unwell, we will keep you locked up, and we will coerce you to take it. If you object, we will restrain you and drug you to the max 'till we nearly knock you out. And we do not care what you think, this [bran damage] is good for your health, and without it your health would deteriorate. You cannot sue us for the brain damage, it is your treatment, you cannot refuse it, you can complain, but you are unwell and we quacks are experts, professionals, medical and health people, while you are a mentally ill".

What evidence is there that I have any disorder? None. What tests were done (X-ray, MRI, blood checks)? None. So it is just an opinion of a quack that I have a disorder. It is an opinion that I need to have a forced brain damage because he wants me numb, dull, flat, to the point where I will not complain about anything, and others will not complain about anything. Nobody cares about any crime or abuse done to me.

According to psychiatry:
All difficult life situations are warrants for an order of brain damage, and it is good for your health to become permanently a zombie.

According to me:
I say I was assaulted. I have no evidence. Because of that quacks say I am delusional.
They say I am delusional. They have done to X-ray, MRI, blood checks, and have no other test that would prove that. I say they are the ones who are delusional. They have false belief and they cannot prove what they are saying. I have evidence to the contrary of what they say, and they still have their false beliefs. Can we have these quacks diagnose each other and brain damage each other instead of abusing normal people? They have no effing idea what happened or did not happen in my flat, so how come they are allowed to overrule everything I say by their opinion? How can you reliably make an opinion about what happened to someone or did not happen? Just because something unusual happens does not mean that the person who tells you about it is not OK. In my life I have seen tons of things that I would not believe without seeing them myself, and yet I do not think that someone telling me something I cannot believe gives me the right to damage his brain for that without verifying the facts. Did the quacks verify the facts? No. Did anyone offer any counter-evidence to what I was saying? No. Did anyone investigate what happened? No. Is there any credibility of a quack's opinion when he has not seen what happened? No. And is he right to order a forced brain damage to me? No.

How can I challenge the quack's opinion and disprove it to get this false diagnosis removed from my medical file in the country which I had to leave because of this diagnosis? The quack has done an extreme damage to my life, his opinion is wrong, and you know how many wrong opinions you hear every day from your colleagues, friends, enemies, even from real doctors of medicine who tell you one day it is healthy to eat X and later change it that X is actually very bad for your health. It is still a matter of something that happened to me, I do not have any history of any mental problems, and the quack who could not believe it said that in his opinion it is a disorder, and now I will be forced to damage my brain by swallowing toxic drug, and if I refuse to swallow it he will inject into my bloodstream even worse drug with more damaging effects. They call this damage deceitfully "benefit of medication" and the pharm cartel makes loads of money on people who got commanded to damage their brain for life-time. It will just keep shrinking (the drug stops metabolism), and unlike the quack I have a memory of what happened because I was there. Who is he to say his word is more than mine? I have an education, my profession is backed in science unlike his, I do not say something did not happen unless I have evidence that it did not, the quack is delusional.

If anybody read this, what would you do? Is there any way to remove false diagnosis from your file, challenge the quacks opinion, or at least prove the drugs are harmful for you, absolutely not needed, at best they are placebo and at worst chemical lobotomy, and that you do not need to be coerced or controlled by any quack because you are not danger to anyone, and mainly that quacks are not good for your health, but that they are to the contrary?

quackery wrote:If anybody read this, what would you do?

Donate time to the anti psychiatry movement by writing online and spreading links exposing there crimes and abuses. That's what I do.

I know it's difficult after getting locked up and raped with drugs by those people. I always call it rape cause rape by definition is putting something inside the body of another without consent using threats and force. Rape is the ultimate violation of a person.

I was very angry for a long time over my treatment in that place and lucky for them I was not injected after I continued to refuse the pill overdose they were trying to coerce because I would have done something evil, but just, in retaliation. I swore to myself if they did carry out that injection threat I would get even some day. Kept telling myself, don't fight them in here, if they hurt you let time pass then get them outside when its all over.

All my anger of course was a "symptom of the illness" no one wrote down how I felt about there strip search and the threats made at me when I said no thanks, I am not getting naked for your viewing or my reaction to the needle threat.

Forced clothing removal, again like rape.

The whole ordeal was nightmare, the only fun I had was jamming up a keyhole with a splinter of wood I found and watching them try and try get the door to that office open. If I just turn and push a little different than the last 5 people that tried, retards working in that place.

Pissed off inpatient ? Jam up some locks and enjoy the show.

Clearing medical record, thats a tough one. Lets see if anyone else answers.

-- Mon Feb 23, 2015 12:24 am --

And welcome to the anti psych forum !

Welcome to the forum!

Glad to see you posting.

I am sorry about the experience you endured. Many people have at no fault of there own.

Psychiatry is a not a science and a type of medicine that is 2000 years behind the rest of physical medicine.

Copy_Cat is right, activism is a great place to start. Having your voice heard is what counts, one that makes all the difference in the world. Truth speaks louder than words.

Delusional thought is not the exclusive possession of one group. Such an idea is itself is delusional.

Delusions are one of the peculiarities to which human flesh is heir. Man is necessarily delusional. Reality signifies different things to different people. We all of us process the real world through our own subjective filter of concepts, experiences, desires, emotions, and interests.

I think Francis Bacon perfectly understood why it is man is necessarily delusional when he said, in his discourse on truth in his essays, "doth any man doubt that if there were taken out of men's minds vain opinions, flattering hopes, false valuations, imaginations as one would, and the like, but it would of a number of men poor shrunken things, full of melancholy and indisposition, and unpleasing to themselves?"

A man's love of truth stands in direct proportion to the degree to which he stands to profit from it.

Contrary to the notion of man as a rational animal, man is entirely subject to his emotions, his appetites, his desires, his prejudices, for which reason he often errs in his perception of reality.

The shrink's opinion is that I am delusional. He is an idiot. I stopped taking his brain-damaging deceitful drug and I do not have any symptoms of anything. The question is whether it is possible to challenge the false diagnosis when as a healthy person I got falsely accused of this #######4 because of his thoughtless, careless, uneducated, unscientific opinion.

http://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/legal-rights/legal-advice-service-faqs/#record

http://mindfreedom.uk/

Hope your alright, getting psych raped is a nasty the way there is little recourse and with people calling the whole ordeal "help", treatment and "care" it's almost infuriating.

Another parallel to sexual assault is victim blaming. Often victims of psychiatric assault are blamed for there mistreatment.

Again the thing that got me through it was contributing to the anti psychiatry movement.