I thought of this topic because the TV news is all about the CIA torture report this week.
Of course the United Nations psychiatric torture report did not make any headline news on TV or in the newspapers.
The Special Rapporteur on Torture in March 2013 called for an absolute ban on nonconsensual psychiatric interventions, including restraint, solitary confinement, and nonconsensual administration of electroshock, psychosurgery and mind-altering drugs such as neuroleptics. He also urged repeal of legal provisions authorizing confinement and compulsory treatment in mental health settings, and said that detention on mental health grounds is unjustified. See the statement of the Special Rapporteur, his report, and the response by the World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry, along with a call to action by CHRUSP. Note that the statement revises certain inconsistent positions that were left in the report.
More here http://www.mdac.info/en/05/03/2013/un-torture-expert-no-more-treatment-without-consent
Human experimentation without consent has been prohibited in any setting since 1947, when the Nuremberg Code, which resulted from the prosecution of Nazi doctors, set down 10 sacrosanct principles. The code states that voluntary consent of subjects is essential and that all unnecessary physical and mental suffering should be avoided.
Does any of this stop those 'doctors' from telling patients 'take these pills or else' ? NO.
Or else of course is restraint , forced injection and the threat usually includes the 'state hospital'.
THE RIGHT NOT TO BE TORTURED
• “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” (United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 5)
The labels “antipsychotics” and “antidepressants” are seriously misleading. The “antipsychotics” do not combat or cure “psychosis” or “mental illness”, and “antidepressants” do not combat or cure depression or the fraudulent diagnosis “bipolar mood disorder”. Psychiatric drugs (“medication”) chemically control and disable people -- sometimes permanently. Neuroleptics is a more accurate term for “antipsychotics”, it means “nerve-seizing”. These psychiatric drugs are much more powerful, debilitating and brain-disabling than the “tranquilizers” (benzodiazepines), which by the way are addictive. The neuroleptics and antidepressants frequently make people look and act apathetic, zombie-like as if they’ve been lobotomized -- even at moderate or low doses. These allegedly “safe and effective medications” always produce painful and serious “side effects”, some are health-threatening and brain-damaging; others are life-threatening. Consider these common effects: muscle cramps, dizziness, blurred vision, seizures, tardive dyskinesia (a permanent neurological disorder characterized by involuntary movements caused by the neuroleptics), tardive dementia, akathisia (constant restless pacing), nightmares, psychosis, parkinsonism, neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS is a neurological disorder with a prevalence rate of 2%-3%, and mortality rate of 20%-25%), and sudden death. Tardive dyskinesia (TD), tardive dementia, NMS and parkinsonism are all signs of brain damage. Although TD was discovered and reported in medical journals in the mid-1960s, the psychiatrists covered up or failed to warn patients about this horrific neurological “side effect” for about 20 years until the 1980s. After a few weeks or months on such “medication”, most patients look and act like a zombie, apathetic, indifferent to their surroundings. Dr. Peter Breggin (1997; 1991), Dr.Lars Martensson (1998), and other professional critics have documented these horrendous effects. Many psychiatric survivor-activists and other critics prefer the label “chemical lobotomy”, it succinctly describes their zombie experience. In a psychoprison or psychiatric ward, virtually everyone gets drugged - “put on meds”. Or threatened -- “take your meds, or else”. This is also true of children who are admitted to psychiatric wards (LeFrancois, 2006).
Forced drugging compounds this abuse. Informed consent is a cruel sham since psychiatrists rarely if ever warn incarcerated involuntary and voluntary patients about common health risks and non-medical alternatives to the drugs. More often than not, psychiatrists coerce, threaten, or intimidate patients into consenting to “medication”
This is from http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol7-1/weitz2008.html
Well that's my post, I lived this nightmare of the strip search , psychiatric incarceration, coercion and threats for very minor psychiatric offenses . My original complaint was anxiety and insomnia and in less than 2 years of beginning their "treatments" (pills, pills and more pills) I got much much worse and I am now showing up at emergency rooms with panic attacks and endured the inpatient torture chambers several times. Of course no one EVER asked what were you like before the pills or suggested alternatives, nope, no way, they just went directly to threats if I disagreed with the "need" for even stronger disable your brain and mind pills.
Something needs to be done, the most common defense I heard patients say to the abusers inpatient "I am going to sue this place" . I must have heard it 100 times so the doctors and staff must have heard it tens of thousands of times and since it rarely happens the threat is ignored and the human rights violations just continue unabated.
You must under duress swallow these pills so we can see what effect they have on the function of your mind and body = Torture Period.