Check out this writing on the "baker act"
If you are Baker Acted, you can be detained, searched and your name run through the court and legal system electronically. The police will come to wherever you are, and insist that you immediately stop doing whatever you are doing at that moment, in order to be handcuffed, stuffed into the back of a police cruiser and delivered like an escaped felon into institutionalization. Once you are under psych lock down, the cops job with you is done.
If you refuse to come willingly, you can and will be threatened with violence. And depending on your reaction to that, they may, if you are lucky, only taze you. If you are unlucky, they may taze and beat and or choke/arm lock/wrist lock you and pepper spray you into submission.
With your mood now set properly for an accurate mental health assessment, completely outraged and trembling with indignation and possibly, even probably, crying, you now get your ride to the psych hospital—a ‘Baker Act Receiving Facility’. Your tears will probably stop by the time you get there, to be replaced with rage and anxiety of what is to come. Upon your arrival and intake the psych nurses are going to take one quick look at you and take in your agitation and irritation and they will make notes about you and you will be considered to be manic or having a manic episode.
The standard treatment for a person experiencing mania is ...
Read more
http://intentions.wordpress.com/2010/12/13/the-baker-act-explained/Here is what I have to say about this:
The police usually will ask you "would you rather goto jail ?" The very last time this happened to me I said "yes I would" and spent the night in the drunk tank and left with no charges the next day. This is embarrassing for me be to writing about experiences like this but that was back when I was still screwing around with psychiatry's "meds" that were messing up my emotions and judgment in the usual way. The police think "would you rather goto jail" is a valid threat but in jail you have the right to due process of law and are not subject to drug experiments and/or forced drugging-drug rapes by psychiatry. There is no enduring the unknown period of detention without the ability to post bond or hear the evidence against you like with psychiatric imprisonment.
This brings me to my next quote and link, the psychiatric Iiving wiII,
I refuse contact with and treatment by any psychiatrist, psychologist or other mental health practitioner as these practices, according to my philosophic and/or religious convictions, do not adequately or properly diagnose and such diagnoses can constitute a false accusation about my behavior and/or beliefs and practices, and are stigmatizing and therefore a threat to one's reputation and physical and mental well-being. Any of their treatments, given against my expressed wish, are an intrusion upon and thus an assault on my body and constitute, in my view, criminal assault. Any involuntary hospitalization or commitment is a violation of my right to liberty and would therefore constitute a false imprisonment by all those advocating and authorizing such action, against my consent and wishes. If in the future, I am accused of a crime, then I direct that I be subject to due process accorded to the criminally accused and not subjected to psychiatric or psychological assessment, processing, profile, confinement or treatments.
Read more
http://www.politicalwatchdog.com/livingwill.html version II
http://www.cchrint.org/psychiatric-living-will/When are the so called "advocates" like the pharma industry front group NAMI going to figure out the problem is human rights violations by psychiatry that are causing people to resist treatment and not the lack of rights for people accused of mental illness ? People with suicidal thinking and other problems should not fear going to the hospital because of what happened last time or the first time they did so and were treated like a sub human or a criminal .
I survived psychiatry.