Cheze2 wrote:Devilock wrote:Certainly ppl who I have met who are so called 'mi', and speaking and hearing what their parents have to say, the parents come across as patronizing, wanting to control the relative, using them as a scapegoat etc. I also think there is a large % of ppl who would never have been diagnosed as 'mi' if it wernt for their familys, they simply would have recovered of got on with their lives and problems in other ways ie not being locked up forced drugged etc
agreed. The question then becomes, is it because the stigma is still out there regarding mental illness that the families are told/feel that they need to control this person? or is it the families who are geared towards needing this control that are driving the stigma?
I think certainly, allot of it comes from the parents being 'told' there whole lives that this is what we do is someone is acting in a way that we don't like, and especially lately theres been allot of 'mental health' anti stigma campaigs saying its 'ok' to 'get help' and the parents think this is the thing to do, some parents would not be aware of what this 'help' consists of and when they find out may or may not like /enjoy it. But yes, some famil\ies are geared towards needing this control and are driving the stigma, theres allot of different situations out there, psychiatry can be very convenient for allot of ppl wanting to to 'get rid of an unwanted relative' or hurting /abusing a relative or just wanting them 'under control'..
also u didn't answer what kind of legislations has 'nami' been able to pass?