Thanks

Cheze2 wrote:Copy_Cat, what about this link? Could you explain your reasons for posting it, or your reactions to it? Otherwise, this would be considered advertising.
Thanks
beneficii wrote:Copy_Cat, what about this link? Could you explain your reasons for posting it, or your reactions to it? Otherwise, this would be considered advertising.
Copy_Cat wrote:beneficii wrote:Copy_Cat, what about this link? Could you explain your reasons for posting it, or your reactions to it? Otherwise, this would be considered advertising.
My first med was an antidepressant after my insomnia was "a symptom of depression" setting the whole pill nighmare into action.
I have read on forums at least 100 times statements from people "I had a manic reaction to anti depressants therefor I am bipolar" using many mixes of words. Its not true but then the next pill gets added...
The worst is parents writing this in on those "is my child ADHD or bipolar ??" threads.
STOP DRUGGING THE CHILD ! Read your own posts ! Your making the kid into a chronic mental patient and he she is not getting better, but worse as the pills pile on !
Take a parenting class and put away the pills.
A satirical view of our prescription drug culture by David Antonuccio http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UnJ4H8JLmM
Cheze2 wrote:Copy_Cat, what about this link? Could you explain your reasons for posting it, or your reactions to it? Otherwise, this would be considered advertising.
Thanks
Copy_Cat wrote:I have read so many posts "I had a manic reaction to anti depressants so that means I'm bipolar".
Copy_Cat wrote:You need to work on those mind reading skills !
beneficii wrote:Could you post what the DSM-5 says on antidepressants and bipolar?
Cheze2 wrote:Consider this checked off my to do list!![]()
Under the Bipolar I: Mania section it lists several criteria.
Criteria D: The episode is not attributable to the physiological effects of a substance (e.g. a drug of abuse, a medication, other treatment) or to another medical condition.
Note: A full manic episode that emerges during antidepressant treatment (e.g. medication, electroconvulsive therapy) but persists at a fully syndromal level beyond the physiological effect of that treatment is sufficient evidence of a manic episode and, therefore, a Bipolar I diagnosis.
Under the Bipolar II: Hypomania section again it lists several criteria.
Criteria F: The episode is not attributable to the physiological effects of a substance (e.g. a drug of abuse, a medication, other treatment).
Note: A full hypomanic episode that emerges during antidepressant treatment (e.g. medication, electroconvulsive therapy) but persists at a fully syndromal level beyond the physiological effect of that treatment is sufficient evidence of a hypomanic episode diagnosis. However, caution is indicated so that one or two symptoms (particularly in creased irritability, edginess, or agitation following antidepressant use) are not taken as sufficient for diagnosis of a hypomanic episode, not necessarily indicative of a bipolar diathesis.
Let the comments reign in on that
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests