Our partner

What a bipolar diagnosis costs

Open discussion about the Anti-Psychiatry Movement and related topics. This includes the opposition to forced treatment and hospitalization as well as the belief that Psychiatric Medication does more harm than good. Please note that these topics are controversial and therefore this forum may offend some people. This is not the belief of Psych Forums or Get Mental Help and this forum was posted to offer a safe place to discuss these beliefs.

What a bipolar diagnosis costs

Postby HaxX » Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:00 am

Depending on what source you consult the prevalance of bipolar disorder in the US population is between 2 to 6.5 percent.

Per psychiatry online:

"The mean charge per patient-year was $22,110 for overall treatment (bipolar disorder and comorbid conditions). The mean reimbursed amount (cost) per patient-year was $11,641, with key cost components of inpatient care (35%), outpatient care (16%), prescription drugs (13%), and physician encounters (11%)"


"This study compared costs for treatment related to bipolar disorder and to comorbid conditions among patients with bipolar disorder and examined costs associated with different medication use and key comorbidities. Not surprisingly, the major cost components for patients with bipolar disorder were hospital services, physician encounters, and prescription drugs.
The total treatment charge and reimbursed amounts per patient-year were $22,110 and $11,641 in 2002 dollars, respectively. On the basis of Wyatt and Henter's (18) estimation of $7 billion in treatment costs and Epidemiologic Catchment Area survey prevalence data (600,000 patients) (36), the annual treatment cost per patient in 1991 was $11,700. With a 4% annual inflation rate, the treatment cost would be approximately $18,012 in 2002. On the basis of the reported treatment cost (reimbursed amount) of $12,200 in 1996 for a patient with bipolar disorder by Stender and colleagues (21), this treatment cost would be approximately $16,054 in 2002 at a 4% annual inflation rate. Both treatment costs fall into the range between the Medicaid-reimbursed amount and the annual charge in the study reported here. The annual reimbursed amount ($11,641) in this study is slightly higher than Simon and Unützer's (22) estimation of $7,200 in 1998, presumably because the health plan they studied involved self-referral to specialty mental health services, moderate cost sharing for outpatient mental health services, prescription drug coverage, and limitations on long-stay psychiatric hospitalization (22). The study reported here included the seven-state managed care Medicaid population, which yielded a relatively large sample size."


Damn, no matter how you slice it that is a lot of money changing hands. Bipolar disorder is the no. 1 most profitable psychiatric diagnosis at this time.

Anti-psychotics drugs alone net the pharmaceutical industry at ca. $14.6bn dollars a year. Psycho-pharmaceuticals are the most profitable sector of the industry, which makes it one of the most profitable business sectors in the world. Americans are less than 5% of the world's population, yet they consume 66% of the world's psych medications.


Amount of money I have contributed to the psychiatric/psych drug pharmacutical industrial complex in the last 3 years:

0 $

If I was a "properly treated, compliant patient"

Estimate 500 $ to 1000 $ dollars out of pocket, ca. 6000 to 16,000 total.

Its pretty easy to see why they want me to be a "good patient" taking meds and seeing my doctor on a regular basis.

LOL
HaxX
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:07 am
Local time: Thu Jun 19, 2025 7:23 am
Blog: View Blog (1)


ADVERTISEMENT

Re: What a bipolar diagnosis costs

Postby Cheze2 » Sat Jun 15, 2013 1:44 pm

This is very true. I think I may have posted this before, though I can't quite remember. It is from a woman who works in a place in Massachusetts, USA called the Transformation Center which is a place focused on recovery. She is a very prominent peer in that area. She is very inspirational to me. She figured out how much she cost the government while not well vs now that she has found recovery and is working. This is one way to prove why switching to a recovery based system is so important.

Lyn's Recovery Story, in Dollars and Cents

An ethnographic exploration of health care costs through one person's story

In these days of sequestrations, budget cliffs, and congressional gridlock, everyone is feeling pressured to cut back, cut corners and find the most inexpensive way to accomplish anything and everything. For those of us who have been working so hard over the past decades, this leads to the obvious question,

"can we afford recovery?"

I mean, after all, it is usually cheaper to just give someone a drug than to invest in the time and effort needed to bring human spirits back alive to strive and thrive. So I decided to look at this question, from the vantage point of my own singular life.

So, I went through a little journey, remembering my experiences over the years and translating them into 2011 Medicaid equivalent dollars.

My worst year, which in those days didn't feel as bad as it should have, involved being in in-patient care for one four-month stretch as well as several other shorter stays during the year. In other words, a year that I felt "at home" more that most. In between, when I was out "in the world," I was attending partial hospitalization 5-days a week, seeing a therapist twice a week and a psycho pharmacologist one time a week. Several of my hospital admissions followed serious suicide attempts that ended up requiring ambulance rides to the emergency room and some stays in the medical hospital before getting transferred to the psychiatric units. And then there were all the meds.... My conservative estimate, converting the costs to 2011 Medicaid equivalency, that single year cost the federal and state governments $208,797.28 in medical and financial assistance, with me unable to contribute in any way to the financial wellness of the government.

In a more "average" year, I would have several inpatient admissions of 2 to 3 weeks in length, partial hospitalization about 75% of the time I wasn't in the hospital; at least several ambulance rides each year and perhaps some medical treatment. I was almost always in therapy twice a week, and saw a psycho pharmacologist at least one time per month, if not more. I remained on a very high regiment of medications, and relied upon Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and received a housing subsidy. A very conservative estimate of an average year, using 2011 Medicaid Equivalency, comes to approximately $132,297.28 per year.

Unfortunately, the focus of treatment was primarily stabilization, insight, acceptance of limitations, and the constant reinforcement of despair. So, the cycle of an "average" year went on and on, for 29 years. So this $132,297.28 per year was also repeated for 29 years. This means that, ultimately, over those years, taking out my worse year, the grand total cost to the Federal and State governments to maintain and stabilize me totaled $3,704.323.85. And if we also add in my worse year, we'll see that my total cost to the Federal and State governments was $3,913,121.12. Four million dollars!!

But, really, this isn't too surprising. Medical care is expensive. As I began to look at my own journey into recovery, physically, emotionally, spiritually and financially, the real message of this exercise began to take hold for me.

My early recovery came about when I found myself in a new setting. It was much more of the external changing the internal than vice versa. I had gone to the BU Recovery Center (a part of BU Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation) as a volunteer, searching for a way to "structure my time" when my partial hospitalization funding ended. I was not prepared to live a life outside of institutional structures, and, frankly, felt abandoned and terrified. The volunteer gig was just something to do to be out of my house one day a week.

This serendipitous commitment led me to an environment where I heard the word "recovery" applied to emotional distress for the first time in my life. I was nearly 50 years old and had been in services since I was 17, but had never been told I could recover. Instead, I had heard about making "realistic" choices based on the limitations of my illnesses, that I had to have greater insight and be compliant with my ongoing treatment, and needed to keep my illnesses front and center. Now, I'm hearing about "recovery," and not as a slight possibility for an exceptional few, but as a given for people like me.

In addition to hearing this concept integrated into all the work being done, I was surrounded by people with lived experience of emotional distress and severe emotional states working in many roles - teacher, student, researcher, and university professor. And finally, I was being treated as a person of value, who had something to contribute, and who brought benefit to the organization. No one talked to me about illness, checked in with me about my "symptoms," or cautioned me about the stress I was taking on.

After two semesters of volunteering, I began the Masters' program at Boston University in Rehabilitation Counseling, and, as part of that program, began working at a part-time internship. Over this first year of involvement at BU, as I began to develop a life of value in the community, my need to rely on my paid professional supporters to whom I turned for so long began to decrease. I wasn't being hospitalized or using expensive ambulance, emergency room and other crisis services. I continued to see my therapist, but was able to see my psycho pharmacologist every three months, instead of monthly or biweekly. My burden on the federal and state government dropped dramatically to $36,469.92 per year, and I was now paying taxes on that income. Over the 5 years I consider my "early recovery," I saved the coffers a total of $479,136.80.

There were bumps along the way, of course. This is real life, not a miracle moment where I was "cured." But reframing my experiences from an illness based model where I had no control beyond chemical experimentation to one where I could recognize my feelings of dis-ease early and work with a myriad of tools to re-center myself also gave me a sense of self-efficacy, empowerment and hope.

Over time, as my confidence and belief in myself grew, and my image of myself transformed. I no longer thought of myself as broken. I saw myself as someone who had overcome extreme difficulties. I let go of those supports and services I had depended upon, including SSI and SSDI, therapy twice a week, hospitalization, and weekly day treatment.

Someone said once, "Recovery is the right to be a tax-paying citizen." I purchase my health insurance through my employer, pay my own co-pays. I pay taxes on a full time job and my consulting work, and yes, on my new car.

We now know that recovery oriented services with hopeful environments, professionals trained in promoting recovery, well trained peer support workers who share their strength and hope, can transform the expectations previously held about mental illness. This investment in recovery really pays off. I was shocked as I calculated the cost of the services I received prior to my recovery. I stared at the numbers, and in the end, I had only one question left....

CAN WE AFFORD TO NOT DO RECOVERY?

https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Tran ... 8693309864
Bipolar I with Psychotic features; Borderline Personality disorder; GAD
Today's cocktail is: Quetiapine 100mg; Latuda 40mg; Trilafon: 8mg
Forum Rules
"No matter how long the night, the dawn always breaks" -African Proverb
Cheze2
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 4380
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:36 pm
Local time: Thu Jun 19, 2025 3:23 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What a bipolar diagnosis costs

Postby HaxX » Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:09 pm

Cheze2 wrote:This is very true. I think I may have posted this before, though I can't quite remember. It is from a woman who works in a place in Massachusetts, USA called the Transformation Center which is a place focused on recovery. She is a very prominent peer in that area. She is very inspirational to me. She figured out how much she cost the government while not well vs now that she has found recovery and is working. This is one way to prove why switching to a recovery based system is so important.


That was a good story, and I wholeheartedly agree.
Unfortunatly a big obstacle is just how insanly profitable being as sick as possible is, and how those in power will fight viciously to keep their status, jobs, facilities and the cash flowing. Being well simply isn't a cash cow.
HaxX
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:07 am
Local time: Thu Jun 19, 2025 7:23 am
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: What a bipolar diagnosis costs

Postby Copy_Cat » Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:04 am

HaxX wrote:Unfortunatly a big obstacle is just how insanly profitable being as sick as possible is, and how those in power will fight viciously to keep their status, jobs, facilities and the cash flowing. Being well simply isn't a cash cow.



This is the best article I ever found explaining the bipolar money making cash cow,

The Latest Mania: Selling Bipolar Disorder by David Healy

http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030185
I survived psychiatry.
Copy_Cat
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 2684
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:35 pm
Local time: Thu Jun 19, 2025 7:23 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What a bipolar diagnosis costs

Postby HaxX » Mon Jun 17, 2013 8:37 am

That was a really good article. I especially liked:

(1) a consistent body of evidence indicates that regular treatment with antipsychotics in the longer run increases mortality [22–26]; and (2) there is evidence that in placebo-controlled trials of antipsychotics submitted in application for schizophrenia licenses there is a statistically significant excess of completed suicides on active treatment [27]. A range of problems associated with antipsychotics, from increased mortality to tardive dyskinesia, never show up in the short-term trials aimed at demonstrating treatment effects in psychiatry.

and

Far from research bringing a skeptical note to bear on clinical enthusiasm, it appears to be adding fuel to the fire. What might once have been thought of as sober institutions, such as Massachusetts General Hospital, have run trials of Risperdal and Zyprexa on children with a mean age of four years old [34, 35]. Massachusetts General Hospital in fact recruited trial participants by running its own television adverts featuring clinicians and parents alerting parents to the fact that difficult and aggressive behavior in children aged four and up might stem from bipolar disorder. This does more than recruit patients with a clear disorder; it suggests that everyday behavioral difficulties may be better seen in terms of a disorder. Given that bipolar disorder in children is all but unrecognised outside the US, it seems likely that a significant proportion of these children will not meet conventional DSM criteria for bipolar I disorder. And given that it is all but impossible for a short-term trial of sedative agents in pediatric states characterized by overactivity not to show some rating scale changes that can be regarded as beneficial, the outcomes of this research are likely to appear to validate the diagnosis and increase the pressure for treatment.


(let us not forget that this hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, still practices lobotomy...)


Copy Cat, you may like this commercial about psychiatric lables in children if you havent yet seen it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wv49RFo1ckQ
HaxX
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:07 am
Local time: Thu Jun 19, 2025 7:23 am
Blog: View Blog (1)


Return to Anti-Psych Forum




  • Related articles
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests