Our partner

Pharmaceutical marketing on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Open discussion about the Anti-Psychiatry Movement and related topics. This includes the opposition to forced treatment and hospitalization as well as the belief that Psychiatric Medication does more harm than good. Please note that these topics are controversial and therefore this forum may offend some people. This is not the belief of Psych Forums or Get Mental Help and this forum was posted to offer a safe place to discuss these beliefs.

Re: Pharmaceutical marketing on Wikipedia, the free encyclop

Postby Copy_Cat » Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:17 am

Protracted_Fermata wrote:[mod edit]


Just a little baking soda in river of vinegar.
I survived psychiatry.
Copy_Cat
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 2684
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:35 pm
Local time: Thu Jun 19, 2025 11:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


ADVERTISEMENT

Re: Pharmaceutical marketing on Wikipedia, the free encyclop

Postby Protracted_Fermata » Wed Apr 17, 2013 4:16 am

Copy_Cat wrote:
Protracted_Fermata wrote:[mod edit]


No, it's more than that, it's a question of personal integrity and striving to reduce or at least not increase the total amount of bs on the www. There is nothing wrong with being sceptical or critical of psychiatry but it is important to do so with cogent argument and well-sourced evidence. It is incongruous to criticise psychiatry for not having an evidence-based approach or for being unethical when you are not presenting evidence for your criticisms and inserting stuff you invent into Wikipedia articles. How can it be that you are permitted to do the things that you contend psychiatrists shouldn't do? What is your justification for maintaining essentially two ethical and evidentiary standards? What exempts you from the ethical and evidentiary standards you would like psychitarists to consistently adhere to?
Protracted_Fermata
Consumer 2
Consumer 2
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:49 am
Local time: Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:53 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pharmaceutical marketing on Wikipedia, the free encyclop

Postby Copy_Cat » Wed Apr 17, 2013 5:44 am

Protracted_Fermata wrote:
Copy_Cat wrote:
Protracted_Fermata wrote:[mod edit]


Just a little baking soda in river of vinegar.


No, it's more than that, it's a question of personal integrity and striving to reduce or at least not increase the total amount of bs on the www. There is nothing wrong with being sceptical or critical of psychiatry but it is important to do so with cogent argument and well-sourced evidence. It is incongruous to criticise psychiatry for not having an evidence-based approach or for being unethical when you are not presenting evidence for your criticisms and inserting stuff you invent into Wikipedia articles. How can it be that you are permitted to do the things that you contend psychiatrists shouldn't do? What is your justification for maintaining essentially two ethical and evidentiary standards? What exempts you from the ethical and evidentiary standards you would like psychitarists to consistently adhere to?


My sources for " [url][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_diagnosis#Past_exposure_to_psychiatric_medications_theory[/url][/url] " are very good.

I was the test subject for many years.

The shrinks should try the drugs themselves, that would be ethical.
I survived psychiatry.
Copy_Cat
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 2684
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:35 pm
Local time: Thu Jun 19, 2025 11:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pharmaceutical marketing on Wikipedia, the free encyclop

Postby Protracted_Fermata » Wed Apr 17, 2013 5:56 am

Copy_Cat wrote:My sources for " [url][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_diagnosis#Past_exposure_to_psychiatric_medications_theory[/url][/url] " are very good.


No they aren't.

I was the test subject for many years.


So what? There are many people in the USA that don't report a negative experience from their contact with psychiatry.
Protracted_Fermata
Consumer 2
Consumer 2
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:49 am
Local time: Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:53 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pharmaceutical marketing on Wikipedia, the free encyclop

Postby Copy_Cat » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:23 am

Protracted_Fermata wrote:
Copy_Cat wrote:My sources for " [url][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_diagnosis#Past_exposure_to_psychiatric_medications_theory[/url][/url] " are very good.


No they aren't.

I was the test subject for many years.


So what? There are many people in the USA that don't report a negative experience from their contact with psychiatry.


Who do I report to ?
I survived psychiatry.
Copy_Cat
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 2684
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:35 pm
Local time: Thu Jun 19, 2025 11:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pharmaceutical marketing on Wikipedia, the free encyclop

Postby Recovered45 » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:08 am

Copy_Cat wrote:Who do I report to ?


Yep.
"Some patients have a mental illness and then get well and then they get weller! I mean they get better than they ever were .... This is an extraordinary and little-realized truth" - Karl Menninger MD
Recovered45
Consumer 5
Consumer 5
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:02 am
Local time: Thu Jun 19, 2025 11:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pharmaceutical marketing on Wikipedia, the free encyclop

Postby Cheze2 » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:30 pm

Insults will not be tolerated. Keep it civil or this thread will be locked as well.
Bipolar I with Psychotic features; Borderline Personality disorder; GAD
Today's cocktail is: Quetiapine 100mg; Latuda 40mg; Trilafon: 8mg
Forum Rules
"No matter how long the night, the dawn always breaks" -African Proverb
Cheze2
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 4380
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:36 pm
Local time: Thu Jun 19, 2025 7:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pharmaceutical marketing on Wikipedia, the free encyclop

Postby masquerade » Wed Apr 17, 2013 11:47 pm

Guys, although this is The Anti Psych Forum, where you're all entitled to express your views and opinions, you're still bound by the rules of the forum. Healthy debate is okay, but there can be a line where debate becomes confrontational, insulting or aggressive. That won't be tolerated and things need to be nipped in the bud. Keep the thread civil, okay.
http://youtu.be/myyITD5LWo4

http://youtu.be/IaBLhoWTkMI

forum-rules.php
No lap top atm so may be delayed in replying to you. If urgent please approach another moderator
masquerade
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 10460
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:48 pm
Local time: Thu Jun 19, 2025 11:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: Pharmaceutical marketing on Wikipedia, the free encyclop

Postby Copy_Cat » Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:01 am

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aripiprazole


Abilify for cocaine addiction LMAO WTF !!!


Look at this ref !

We assessed the dose-dependent effects of aripiprazole on conditioned cue-induced and cocaine-primed reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior following chronic intravenous cocaine self-administration in an animal model of relapse.


http://www.journals.elsevierhealth.com/ ... 06-3223(06)00484-7/abstract

They shot up an animal with cocaine and then got it realy realy stoned on Abilfy so it wanted to eat .

I should say the abilify version of "stoned" brain dead where it also feels like ants are crawling in your muscles and to make em stop you just gota move , the "side" effect of akathisia they don't talk about.

What happended to the animals that hit the coke wile also full of Abilify ? How did they turn out ?
I survived psychiatry.
Copy_Cat
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 2684
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:35 pm
Local time: Thu Jun 19, 2025 11:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pharmaceutical marketing on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Postby Copy_Cat » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:43 pm

"Based on the pretty negative past encounters between pharma employees and Wikipedia editors (pharma employees trying to edit entries about their own products in a quite non-neutral way), we advise you to employ a Wikipedia editor if you want to make sure only evidence-based information is included in entries about your own products. Appointing someone from within your company as a 'spokesperson' in Wikipedia who would perform all edits on behalf of the company is an excellent way to update those entries."

See http://pharmamkting.blogspot.com/2014/01/is-pharma-working-with-wikipedia-to.html

Below, the pharma hack who blocked my IP on wikipedia for adding true information bad for pharma sales to wiki pages;

“About me
I am a medicinal chemist with a PhD in organic chemistry. I have worked in both academic and industrial settings doing teaching, basic research and applied research mostly in the area of drug discovery. I try to improve Wikipedia by creating, updating, correcting, organizing, and copyediting articles related to organic chemistry, particularly heterocyclic compounds and natural organic compounds. To get a better idea of my interests, just take a look at some of the articles I have started or this gallery of some of the ~5000 chemical structure images I have uploaded, or see my contributions.

As a Wikipedia administrator, the chores that I routinely assist with include speedy deletions, always beginning with the attack articles, and blocking those who abuse their editing privileges.

With my wife and kids, I live in suburban Pennsylvania.”

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Edgar181

I told ya so.
I survived psychiatry.
Copy_Cat
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 2684
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:35 pm
Local time: Thu Jun 19, 2025 11:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to Anti-Psych Forum




  • Related articles
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests