Mental health backround check

I refuse contact with and treatment by any psychiatrist, psychologist or other mental health practitioner as these practices, according to my philosophic and/or religious convictions, do not adequately or properly diagnose and such diagnoses can constitute a false accusation about my behavior and/or beliefs and practices, and are stigmatizing and therefore a threat to one's reputation and physical and mental well-being.

I maintain my right not to have any psychiatric evaluation or diagnosis based upon the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) as such diagnoses are unreliable. According to Allen Frances, who was chairman of the fourth edition of DSM, “There are no objective tests in psychiatry—no X-ray, laboratory, or exam finding that says definitely that someone does or does not have a mental disorder.” (“Psychiatric Fads and Overdiagnosis,” Psychology Today, 2 June 2010.) Additionally, the DSM system is not scientific. It’s own editors state that “there is no assumption that each category of mental disorder is a completely discrete entity with absolute boundaries dividing it from other mental disorders or from no mental disorder.” (DSM-IV, pg. xxii)
Such codes and descriptions should not be entered into my medical records as this unreliable and unscientific information will remain in my records and may wrongly influence any future medical treatment I might receive.

http://www.politicalwatchdog.com/livingwill.html

There are no lab tests, brain scans, X-rays or chemical imbalance tests that can verify any mental disorder is a physical condition. This is not to say that people do not get depressed, or that people can’t experience emotional or mental duress, but psychiatry has repackaged these emotions and behaviors as “disease” in order to sell drugs.

http://www.cchr.org/quick-facts/introduction.html

Backround check that.

It’s time for a National Mental Health Offender Registry!


Posted on January 23rd, 2012
We at NamiDearest have been highly concerned about our wandering mentally ill loved ones as well as those groups who refer to themselves as “survivors of psychiatry”, particularly those from the “antipsychiatry” factions. True to our cause, we have developed a plan to curtail the unacceptable freedoms bestowed upon these people by the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution.

Today, my fellow NamiDearests, we call for a National Mental Health Offender Registry, referred to from herein as the “MHOR“. The MHOR would be modeled upon the already existing National Sex Offender Registry, but it would not be limited to those who’ve been convicted of criminal offenses. A serious mental health offense exists by application of any diagnosis by a mental health clinician, and anyone so diagnosed would be included in the registry and monitored for compliance with a psychiatric treatment regimen. This is all about prevention!

Read more http://www.namidearest.com/

-- Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:38 pm --

Im watching the news , they want to create a system to track peoples bogus psych labels.

Gabrielle Giffords is a Jewish American politician and former member of the United States House of Representatives from Arizona's 8th congressional district was named Legislator of the Year by the Mental Health Association of Arizona in 2004. Ironic right ?
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/giffords.html

The new bill that just passed in NY states, "requires any therapist who believes a mental health patient made a credible threat of harming others to report the threat to a mental health director, who would then have to report serious threats to the state Department of Criminal Justice Services. A patient's gun could be taken from him or her, as well."

I wonder if the background checks, and maybe standardized evaluations, would be used to take guns from people who have mental disorders.

It scares me that I may have to register as a mentally ill person on a registry, where people in my neighborhood would all know that I'm crazy. That could seriously jeapardize my career since I'm working for the government and I have a clearance.

Ian Reynir wrote:I wonder if the background checks, and maybe standardized evaluations, would be used to take guns from people who have mental disorders.

A mental health offense already causes health insurance costs to go up.

I wonder if the mental background checks, and maybe standardized evaluations, would be used to take driver licences, jobs, and screw up credit reports ...

Individuals who are convicted of a controlled substance offense can have have their driver license suspended for 180 days... already.

Will voluntary substance abuse treatment be a mental health offense on peoples records ?

NAMIDearest is a joke website, right?

If not, that's some seriously fascist $#%^.