am on a CTO so that might mean I'm legally obliged to take their $#%^ or they throw me back in hospital to get treatment,
Yeah, that's probably what it means. I had no idea such laws were common in the English speaking countries. Seriously, can you imagine a country where people, either as individuals or as a community, HAVE TO pay for and use expensive drugs that are ineffective in most cases and often quite harmful?? Well, that's your country, apparently. It's more insane than any single person could ever hope to be. There is no evidence at all that it's for the greater good:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_ ... r#EvidenceIf you follow the money, the trail of it ends at the doorstep of purely for-profit corporations who have deceived the public for decades about the efficacy and safety of their products. This is now public information, largely thanks to the Freedom Of Information Act and a couple of researchers who had the imagination and integrity to use it to check whether even the drug companies' own trials proved efficacy or not. (They don't.)
And since it's public information, that also means the psychiatrists are now collaborators, since they choose to do nothing about it. They should boycott all antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs (which are useless anyway) until the FDA and similar authorities require a meta analysis of all submitted trials of a drug to prove efficacy and safety, effective immediately and applied retrospectively to all drugs they have ever approved. And then the psychiatrists should actually look at those analyses and base their treatment practices on the damn data, not wishful thinking. Mind you, that's just the least they should be doing. It's not much, it's just the absolute minimum for anyone who claims medical authority in the field of psychiatry.